Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4325 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSIONS

(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 4325)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1981–2017 · leading case: In Re Zoning Permit Application of Clyde, 437 A.2d 121 (Vt. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Zoning Permit Application of Clyde, 437 A.2d 121 (Vt. 1981). “24 V.S.A. § 4325. The ordinance is not thereby made invalid.”
In Re Cottrell, 614 A.2d 381 (Vt. 1992). “See 24 V.S.A. § 4325(2). Zoning amendments must either be prepared by the planning commission or “be submitted in writing along with any supporting documents to the planning commission,” which then proceeds as if it had prepared the amendment.”
Devonwood Investors, LLC 75 Cherry Street (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “24 V.S.A. § 4325(11). Most importantly, there is no suggestion that the report itself was inadequate, that the failure of the Planning Commission members to personally prepare the report prejudiced any party or obstructed or hindered the process, or that the process as…”
Deer View LLC PUD (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008). “4 Appellee-Applicant’s Motion to Dismiss Questions 2 and 3 Appellee-Applicant has also moved to dismiss Questions 2 and 3 of Appellant’s Statement of Questions, which are stated in terms of whether “the New Haven Bylaws provide a way to prevent danger to public safety,” citing §…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4325(11) — 1 case
Devonwood Investors, LLC 75 Cherry Street (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “24 V.S.A. § 4325(11). Most importantly, there is no suggestion that the report itself was inadequate, that the failure of the Planning Commission members to personally prepare the report prejudiced any party or obstructed or hindered the process, or that the process as…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4325(2) — 1 case
In Re Cottrell, 614 A.2d 381 (Vt. 1992). “See 24 V.S.A. § 4325(2). Zoning amendments must either be prepared by the planning commission or “be submitted in writing along with any supporting documents to the planning commission,” which then proceeds as if it had prepared the amendment.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4325(3) — 1 case
Deer View LLC PUD (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008). “4 Appellee-Applicant’s Motion to Dismiss Questions 2 and 3 Appellee-Applicant has also moved to dismiss Questions 2 and 3 of Appellant’s Statement of Questions, which are stated in terms of whether “the New Haven Bylaws provide a way to prevent danger to public safety,” citing §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.