Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL POWERS

(Cite as: 30 V.S.A. § 248)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 78 cases (16 in the last 5 years), 1973–2026 · leading case: In re Petition of Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC for Certificate of Pub. Good Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, 2016 VT 50 (Vt. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Petition of Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC for Certificate of Pub. Good Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, 2016 VT 50 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 31× “2015-230 In re Petition of Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC Supreme Court for Certificate of Public Good Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, et al. On Appeal from Public Service Board October Term, 2015 James Volz, Chair Alan B.”
In Re Amended Petition of UPC Vermont Wind, LLC, 2009 VT 19 (Vt. 2009). · cites it 14× “We reject Ridge’s arguments and affirm the Board’s decision.”
In re Petition of Green Mountain Power Corp. for Approval to Invest in Hydroelectric Generation Facilities Located Outside Vermont (Allco Renewable Energy Ltd., Appellant), 198 A.3d 36 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 15× “In its motion Allco made a wide array of arguments, in particular challenging the hearing officer's determination that it had no substantial, particularized interest in the proceeding, and arguing that the officer's decision effectively banned all ratepayers and competitors from…”
In re Petition of Apple Hill Solar LLC, 2021 VT 69 (Vt. 2021). · cites it 17× “As the PUC explained, changes made to 30 V.S.A. § 248 after the petition was filed are “not applicable to this case and [were] not assessed as part of the review of this case.”
In Re East Georgia Cogeneration Ltd. P'ship, 614 A.2d 799 (Vt. 1992). · cites it 16× “The rule defines a "qualifying facility" as a cogeneration or small power production facility under federal and state law which has also "received a certificate of public good under 30 V.S.A. § 248." 4.103(A)(9). The rule also establishes the authority of the Board to designate…”
In re Green Mountain Power Corp., Vermont Elec. Coop., Vermont Elec. Power Co., 2012 VT 89 (Vt. 2012). · cites it 12× “and Vermont Transco LLC (VELCO) [2] requested a certificate of public good (CPG) under 30 V.S.A. § 248 to construct a wind-electric-generation facility on Lowell Mountain.”
In re Petition of Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC (Therese Holmes & Timothy Holmes, Appellants), 2021 VT 3 (Vt. 2021). · cites it 9× “Third, DPS contends that the PUC correctly determined the project is located on a preferred site. Finally, DPS argues the PUC correctly found that the project would not have an undue adverse effect on aesthetics, orderly development, air pollution, and greenhouse gases.”
Petition of Twenty-Four Vermont Utils., 618 A.2d 1295 (Vt. 1992). · cites it 11× “, On October 12,1990 and January 7,1991, the Public Service Board granted petitioners, twenty-four Vermont utilities, interim and then conditional approval, pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, to purchase more than four billion dollars worth of electricity over a thirty-year period…”
In re Petition of Conservation Law Found., 188 A.3d 667 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 5× “Considering the criteria in 30 V.S.A. § 248, the Commission concluded that the Project "will promote the general good of the State of Vermont," subject to a condition (among others) that: Construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed Project shall be in accordance…”
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. Shumlin, 733 F.3d 393 (2d Cir. 2013). · cites it 4× “See Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248 (b). 5 The Department oversees laws relating to public service corporations and represents the State of Vermont in the procurement of energy in hearings before the Board in an advocacy capacity.”
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 160 (Fed. Cl. 2010). · cites it 6× “) During the petition process, ENVY worked with Vermont’s Department of Public Service to obtain the desired power uprate.”
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, 683 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2012). · cites it 4× “US (1) obtaining a Certificate of Public Good (“Certificate”) from the Vermont Public Service Board (“Board”) pursu- ant to Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248 ; and (2) complying with the terms of a spent fuel storage Memorandum of Under- standing, which had been negotiated with the…”
Show all 78 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(a) — 12 cases
In Re Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 769 A.2d 668 (Vt. 2001).
Grice v. Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc., 2008 VT 64 (Vt. 2008).
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 160 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “) During the petition process, ENVY worked with Vermont’s Department of Public Service to obtain the desired power uprate.”
In Re Proposed Sale of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, 2003 VT 53 (Vt. 2003).
Petition of Twenty-Four Vermont Utils., 618 A.2d 1295 (Vt. 1992). “, On October 12,1990 and January 7,1991, the Public Service Board granted petitioners, twenty-four Vermont utilities, interim and then conditional approval, pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, to purchase more than four billion dollars worth of electricity over a thirty-year period…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(a)(1) — 1 case
Petition of Twenty-Four Vermont Utils., 618 A.2d 1295 (Vt. 1992). “, On October 12,1990 and January 7,1991, the Public Service Board granted petitioners, twenty-four Vermont utilities, interim and then conditional approval, pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, to purchase more than four billion dollars worth of electricity over a thirty-year period…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(a)(1)(A) — 3 cases
In re Petition of Green Mountain Power Corp. for Approval to Invest in Hydroelectric Generation Facilities Located Outside Vermont (Allco Renewable Energy Ltd., Appellant), 198 A.3d 36 (Vt. 2018). “In its motion Allco made a wide array of arguments, in particular challenging the hearing officer's determination that it had no substantial, particularized interest in the proceeding, and arguing that the officer's decision effectively banned all ratepayers and competitors from…”
Petition of Twenty-Four Vermont Utils., 618 A.2d 1295 (Vt. 1992). “, On October 12,1990 and January 7,1991, the Public Service Board granted petitioners, twenty-four Vermont utilities, interim and then conditional approval, pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, to purchase more than four billion dollars worth of electricity over a thirty-year period…”
In Re Petition of Otter Creek Solar LLC, 2025 VT 65 (Vt. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(a)(1)(B) — 1 case
In re Petition of Apple Hill Solar LLC, 2023 VT 57 (Vt. 2023).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(a)(2) — 10 cases
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 160 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “) During the petition process, ENVY worked with Vermont’s Department of Public Service to obtain the desired power uprate.”
In re Investigation Into Solarcity Corp., 210 A.3d 1255 (Vt. 2019).
In Re Halnon, 811 A.2d 161 (Vt. 2002).
In Re Proposed Sale of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, 2003 VT 53 (Vt. 2003).
In re Petition of Portland Street Solar LLC, 2021 VT 67 (Vt. 2021).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(a)(2)(A) — 8 cases
In re Petition of GMPSolar-Richmond, LLC (Allco Renewable Energy Ltd., Appellant), 179 A.3d 1232 (Vt. 2017).
In re Cross Pollination, 2012 VT 29 (Vt. 2012).
In re Petition of Portland Street Solar LLC, 2021 VT 67 (Vt. 2021).
In re Investigation Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. §§ 30 & 209 into whether the Initiated Site Preparation at Apple Hill in Bennington, Vermont (Allco Renewable Energy Ltd., Appellant), 2021 VT 92 (Vt. 2021).
Hinsdale Trust Boundary Adjustment (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(a)(2)(B) — 4 cases
Farrell v. Vermont Elec. Power Co., & Vermont Transco, LLC, 2012 VT 96 (Vt. 2012).
In Re Amended Petition of UPC Vermont Wind, LLC, 2009 VT 19 (Vt. 2009). “We reject Ridge’s arguments and affirm the Board’s decision.”
In re Petition of Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC (Therese Holmes & Timothy Holmes, Appellants), 2021 VT 3 (Vt. 2021). “Third, DPS contends that the PUC correctly determined the project is located on a preferred site. Finally, DPS argues the PUC correctly found that the project would not have an undue adverse effect on aesthetics, orderly development, air pollution, and greenhouse gases.”
In re Application of Derby GLC Solar, LLC, 2019 VT 77 (Vt. 2019).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(a)(3) — 4 cases
In re Petition of Conservation Law Found., 188 A.3d 667 (Vt. 2018). “Considering the criteria in 30 V.S.A. § 248, the Commission concluded that the Project "will promote the general good of the State of Vermont," subject to a condition (among others) that: Construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed Project shall be in accordance…”
In re Vermont Gas Sys., Inc. (William Marks, Nancy Baker, Linda Gage, Rachael Smolker, Melanie Pulley, Stephanie Spencer, & Lawrence Shelton, Appellants), 174 A.3d 1253 (Vt. 2017).
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 160 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “) During the petition process, ENVY worked with Vermont’s Department of Public Service to obtain the desired power uprate.”
In re Vermont Gas Sys., Inc. (William Marks, Nancy Baker, Linda Gage, Rachael Smolker, Melanie Pulley, Stephanie Spencer, & Lawrence Shelton, Appellants), 2017 VT 83 (Vt. 2017).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(a)(3)(A) — 1 case
In Re Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc., 2006 VT 21 (Vt. 2006).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(a)(4)(C) — 2 cases
Glebe Mountain Wind Energy, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006).
Glebe Mountain Wind Energy, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(a)(4)(E) — 3 cases
In re Petition of Swanton Wind LLC, 204 A.3d 635 (Vt. 2018).
Glebe Mountain Wind Energy, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006).
Glebe Mountain Wind Energy, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(a)(4)(F) — 1 case
In re Petition of Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC for Certificate of Pub. Good Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, 2016 VT 50 (Vt. 2016). “2015-230 In re Petition of Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC Supreme Court for Certificate of Public Good Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, et al. On Appeal from Public Service Board October Term, 2015 James Volz, Chair Alan B.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(a)(4)(F)(i) — 1 case
In re New Haven GLC Solar, LLC, 175 A.3d 1211 (Vt. 2017).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(b) — 16 cases
In Re East Georgia Cogeneration Ltd. P'ship, 614 A.2d 799 (Vt. 1992). “The rule defines a "qualifying facility" as a cogeneration or small power production facility under federal and state law which has also "received a certificate of public good under 30 V.S.A. § 248." 4.103(A)(9). The rule also establishes the authority of the Board to designate…”
In re Petition of Green Mountain Power Corp. for Approval to Invest in Hydroelectric Generation Facilities Located Outside Vermont (Allco Renewable Energy Ltd., Appellant), 198 A.3d 36 (Vt. 2018). “In its motion Allco made a wide array of arguments, in particular challenging the hearing officer's determination that it had no substantial, particularized interest in the proceeding, and arguing that the officer's decision effectively banned all ratepayers and competitors from…”
In Re Amended Petition of UPC Vermont Wind, LLC, 2009 VT 19 (Vt. 2009). “We reject Ridge’s arguments and affirm the Board’s decision.”
In re Petition of Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC for Certificate of Pub. Good Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, 2016 VT 50 (Vt. 2016). “2015-230 In re Petition of Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC Supreme Court for Certificate of Public Good Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, et al. On Appeal from Public Service Board October Term, 2015 James Volz, Chair Alan B.”
Petition of Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc., 306 A.2d 687 (Vt. 1973).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(b)(1) — 13 cases
In re Petition of Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC for Certificate of Pub. Good Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, 2016 VT 50 (Vt. 2016). “2015-230 In re Petition of Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC Supreme Court for Certificate of Public Good Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, et al. On Appeal from Public Service Board October Term, 2015 James Volz, Chair Alan B.”
In re Petition of Apple Hill Solar LLC, 2021 VT 69 (Vt. 2021). “As the PUC explained, changes made to 30 V.S.A. § 248 after the petition was filed are “not applicable to this case and [were] not assessed as part of the review of this case.”
In Re Amended Petition of UPC Vermont Wind, LLC, 2009 VT 19 (Vt. 2009). “We reject Ridge’s arguments and affirm the Board’s decision.”
In re Petition of Apple Hill Solar LLC (Libby Harris & Apple Hill Homeowners Ass'n, Appellants), 2019 VT 64 (Vt. 2019).
In re Petition of Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC (Therese Holmes & Timothy Holmes, Appellants), 2021 VT 3 (Vt. 2021). “Third, DPS contends that the PUC correctly determined the project is located on a preferred site. Finally, DPS argues the PUC correctly found that the project would not have an undue adverse effect on aesthetics, orderly development, air pollution, and greenhouse gases.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(b)(1)(C) — 1 case
In re Petition of Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC (Therese Holmes & Timothy Holmes, Appellants), 2021 VT 3 (Vt. 2021). “Third, DPS contends that the PUC correctly determined the project is located on a preferred site. Finally, DPS argues the PUC correctly found that the project would not have an undue adverse effect on aesthetics, orderly development, air pollution, and greenhouse gases.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(b)(10) — 1 case
In re Application of Derby GLC Solar, LLC, 2019 VT 77 (Vt. 2019).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(b)(2) — 5 cases
Petition of Twenty-Four Vermont Utils., 618 A.2d 1295 (Vt. 1992). “, On October 12,1990 and January 7,1991, the Public Service Board granted petitioners, twenty-four Vermont utilities, interim and then conditional approval, pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, to purchase more than four billion dollars worth of electricity over a thirty-year period…”
In Re East Georgia Cogeneration Ltd. P'ship, 614 A.2d 799 (Vt. 1992). “The rule defines a "qualifying facility" as a cogeneration or small power production facility under federal and state law which has also "received a certificate of public good under 30 V.S.A. § 248." 4.103(A)(9). The rule also establishes the authority of the Board to designate…”
Petition of Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc., 306 A.2d 687 (Vt. 1973).
In Re Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc., 2006 VT 21 (Vt. 2006).
In Re Petition of Otter Creek Solar LLC, 2025 VT 65 (Vt. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(b)(3) — 2 cases
Petition of Twenty-Four Vermont Utils., 618 A.2d 1295 (Vt. 1992). “, On October 12,1990 and January 7,1991, the Public Service Board granted petitioners, twenty-four Vermont utilities, interim and then conditional approval, pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, to purchase more than four billion dollars worth of electricity over a thirty-year period…”
In re New Haven GLC Solar, LLC, 175 A.3d 1211 (Vt. 2017).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(b)(4) — 6 cases
In Re Amended Petition of UPC Vermont Wind, LLC, 2009 VT 19 (Vt. 2009). “We reject Ridge’s arguments and affirm the Board’s decision.”
In re Petition of Green Mountain Power Corp. for Approval to Invest in Hydroelectric Generation Facilities Located Outside Vermont (Allco Renewable Energy Ltd., Appellant), 198 A.3d 36 (Vt. 2018). “In its motion Allco made a wide array of arguments, in particular challenging the hearing officer's determination that it had no substantial, particularized interest in the proceeding, and arguing that the officer's decision effectively banned all ratepayers and competitors from…”
Petition of Twenty-Four Vermont Utils., 618 A.2d 1295 (Vt. 1992). “, On October 12,1990 and January 7,1991, the Public Service Board granted petitioners, twenty-four Vermont utilities, interim and then conditional approval, pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, to purchase more than four billion dollars worth of electricity over a thirty-year period…”
In re Application of Derby GLC Solar, LLC, 2019 VT 77 (Vt. 2019).
In Re Twenty-Four Elec. Utils., 627 A.2d 355 (Vt. 1993).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(b)(5) — 13 cases
In re Petition of Apple Hill Solar LLC, 2021 VT 69 (Vt. 2021). “As the PUC explained, changes made to 30 V.S.A. § 248 after the petition was filed are “not applicable to this case and [were] not assessed as part of the review of this case.”
In re Petition of Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC (Therese Holmes & Timothy Holmes, Appellants), 2021 VT 3 (Vt. 2021). “Third, DPS contends that the PUC correctly determined the project is located on a preferred site. Finally, DPS argues the PUC correctly found that the project would not have an undue adverse effect on aesthetics, orderly development, air pollution, and greenhouse gases.”
In Re Amended Petition of UPC Vermont Wind, LLC, 2009 VT 19 (Vt. 2009). “We reject Ridge’s arguments and affirm the Board’s decision.”
In re Petition of Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC for Certificate of Pub. Good Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, 2016 VT 50 (Vt. 2016). “2015-230 In re Petition of Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC Supreme Court for Certificate of Public Good Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, et al. On Appeal from Public Service Board October Term, 2015 James Volz, Chair Alan B.”
In re Cross Pollination, 2012 VT 29 (Vt. 2012).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(b)(6) — 2 cases
In Re Petition of Otter Creek Solar LLC, 2025 VT 65 (Vt. 2025).
In re Petition of Vermont Gas Sys., Inc. (Catherine Bock, Appellant), 2024 VT 2 (Vt. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(b)(7) — 2 cases
In Re New England Tel. & Tel. Co., 621 A.2d 232 (Vt. 1993).
In re Application of Derby GLC Solar, LLC, 2019 VT 77 (Vt. 2019).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(d) — 1 case
In Re Burlington Elec. Dep't, 450 A.2d 1131 (Vt. 1982).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(i) — 1 case
In re Petition of Vermont Gas Sys., Inc. (Catherine Bock, Appellant), 2024 VT 2 (Vt. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(j)(1) — 1 case
In re New Haven GLC Solar, LLC, 175 A.3d 1211 (Vt. 2017).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(j)(2) — 2 cases
In re Application of Beach Props., Inc., 2015 VT 130 (Vt. 2015).
In re Application of Beach Props., Inc. d/b/a Basin Harbor Club, for a Certificate of Pub. Good for an Interconnected Grp. Net-Metered Photovoltaic Elec. Power Sys., 2015 VT 130 (Vt. 2015).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(j)(l)(C) — 1 case
In re Programmatic Changes to the Stand.-Offer Prog., 2014 VT 29 (Vt. 2014).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(s)(1) — 1 case
In re Petition of Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC for Certificate of Pub. Good Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, 2016 VT 50 (Vt. 2016). “2015-230 In re Petition of Rutland Renewable Energy, LLC Supreme Court for Certificate of Public Good Pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 248, et al. On Appeal from Public Service Board October Term, 2015 James Volz, Chair Alan B.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 248(s)(4)(B) — 1 case
In re Petition of Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC (Therese Holmes & Timothy Holmes, Appellants), 2021 VT 3 (Vt. 2021). “Third, DPS contends that the PUC correctly determined the project is located on a preferred site. Finally, DPS argues the PUC correctly found that the project would not have an undue adverse effect on aesthetics, orderly development, air pollution, and greenhouse gases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.