(a) Any person, including the enforcing officer, aggrieved by any decision of the board,
may appeal to the Superior Court. The appeal shall not stay proceedings upon the
decision appealed from, but the court may on application, upon notice to the board
and on due cause shown, grant a restraining order. The board shall not be required
to return the original papers acted on by it, but it shall be sufficient to return
certified or sworn copies thereof or such portions thereof as may be pertinent and
material to show the grounds of the decision appealed from and shall be verified.
(b) If upon the hearing it appears to the court that testimony is necessary for the proper
disposition of the matter, it may take evidence or appoint a referee to take such
evidence as it may direct and report the same to the court with his or her findings
of fact and conclusions of law, which shall constitute a part of the proceedings upon
which the determination of the court shall be made. The court may reverse or affirm
wholly or partly or may modify the decision appealed from. (Added 1969, No. 270 (Adj. Sess.); amended 1971, No. 185 (Adj. Sess.), § 206, eff. March 29, 1972; 1973, No. 193 (Adj. Sess.), § 3, eff. April 9, 1974.)
In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (Vt. 2011). “Landlord appealed the ruling pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 5006, which allows an appeal to the superior court by any person aggrieved by a decision of the Board.”
In Re Chittenden Solid Waste Dist., 657 A.2d 197 (Vt. 1995). “§ 4471 (appeal from board of adjustment to superior court); 24 V.S.A. § 5006 (appeal from housing board to superior court); 32 V.”
71 Drew v. Burlington Hous. Bd (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 2ד006 per day from September 15, 2024 until the date that the amount improperly withheld is returned.”
South River v. Burlington Hous. Bd. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). · cites it 2דThe Board addressed each of the deductions South River included in its letter to Christman, noting its opinion as to whether the amounts were appropriate and recoverable.”
Eliason v. Harrison (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018). “24 V.S.A. § 5006. These statutes shall be construed to give municipalities “the fullest and most complete powers possible concerning the subject matter hereof.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 5006(b) — 2 cases
71 Drew v. Burlington Hous. Bd (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “006 per day from September 15, 2024 until the date that the amount improperly withheld is returned.”
South River v. Burlington Hous. Bd. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “The Board addressed each of the deductions South River included in its letter to Christman, noting its opinion as to whether the amounts were appropriate and recoverable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.