Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 27, § 109 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 27 V.S.A. § 109)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1983–2014 · leading case: In Re Soter, 31 B.R. 986 (D. Vt. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Soter, 31 B.R. 986 (D. Vt. 1983). · cites it 5× “” Vt. Stat.Ann. tit. 27, § 109. The waiver of homestead exemption in the 1979 notes related only to the real estate as security for mortgage indebtedness and not to any deficiency arising after default.”
In re Patterson, 482 B.R. 755 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2012). · cites it 8× “Questions Presented In this analysis of whether the Debtor may avoid the Merchants lien and whether the Debtor may claim his current homestead exempt from enforcement of the Merchants lien, there are three legal questions presented: First, did the Debtor acquire his current…”
Brattleboro Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Hardie, 2014 VT 26 (Vt. 2014). · cites it 2× “Thus, when two spouses have established a homestead together, one spouse cannot convey the other’s interest “without the express, written consent and participation of the other co-owner.”
In Re Soter, 26 B.R. 838 (Bankr. D. Vt. 1983). “If her claim is allowed she will have acquired a new homestead which would be subject to the provisions of 27 V.S.A. § 109, viz: “When a person acquires a new homestead, the prior homestead shall be liable for his or her debts and may be conveyed by him or her like other real…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.