Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 27, § 1327 (2026)

Actions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : CONDOMINIUM OWNERSHIP

(Cite as: 27 V.S.A. § 1327)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2023 · leading case: Meadowbrook Condo. Ass'n v. South Burlington Realty Corp., 565 A.2d 238 (Vt. 1989).
Meadowbrook Condo. Ass'n v. South Burlington Realty Corp., 565 A.2d 238 (Vt. 1989). · cites it 4× “27 V.S.A. § 1327. On October 8, 1980, the Association filed suit in the superior court, alleging the existence of significant problems with the condominium's roads, carports, overall drainage, and sewer systems.”
Pines Point Marina v. Rehak, 961 A.2d 574 (Md. 2008). “§ 89-9-1 to -37 (West 2008) (does not specify entities); Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 27, § 1327 (West 2008) (very similar to Kansas’ provision); W.”
Ridgetop Highridge PUD (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “Appellants acknowledge that the Condominium Ownership Act does allow notice on the Association to serve as notice on the individual unit owners, see 27 V.S.A. § 1327, but argue that 27 V.S.A.”
madowitz v. twkoa (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023). “27 V.S.A. § 1327. As indicated in the statute, these claims are not the Association’s own but rather are derivate of the unit owner’s individual claims.”
Madowitz v. The Woods at Killington Owners' Ass'n, Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “27 V.S.A. § 1327. As indicated in the statute, these claims are not the Association’s own but rather are derivate of the unit owner’s individual claims.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.