The party states, desiring by common action to fully utilize and improve their institutional
facilities and provide adequate programs for the confinement, treatment and rehabilitation
of various types of offenders, declare that it is the policy of each of the party
states to provide such facilities and programs on a basis of cooperation with one
another, thereby serving the best interests of such offenders and of society and effecting
economies in capital expenditures and operational costs. The purpose of this compact
is to provide for the mutual development and execution of such programs of cooperation
for the confinement, treatment and rehabilitation of offenders with the most economical
use of human and material resources. (Added 1969, No. 13, § 1, eff. Feb. 28, 1969.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2000–2024 · leading case: Trujillo v. Williams, 465 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2006).
Trujillo v. Williams, 465 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2006). “§§ 77 -28a-l to 77-28a-5; Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, §§ 1601 to 1610; Va.”
Gundlah v. Pallito (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2ד28 V.S.A. §§ 1601– 1621; Fla. Stat. Ann. §§ 941 .”
Daye v. State, 769 A.2d 630 (2000). “” 28 V.S.A. § 1601. Its purpose was to establish orderly procedures for interstate transfers, to ensure that prisoners transferred to other states “shall be treated in a reasonable and humane manner and shall be treated equally -with such similar inmates of the receiving state,”…”
Brandt v. Pallito (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “Brandt was relocated to a prison facility in Pennsylvania, which applied its own rules to bar correspondence between Mr.”
Barron v. VT Doc & Geo Grp., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). “_____________________________ Mary Miles Teachout, Superior Judge to the Interstate Corrections Compact, 28 V.S.A. §§ 1601–1621, the court declines to address that issue.”
Burke v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “28 V.S.A. §§ 1601–1610. The State of Vermont sent Plaintiff Burke to TCCF in October 2018, and he was continuously housed at TCCF from that point through the present.”
Brochu v. Touchette (D. Vt. 2021). “Brochu grieved three issues or actions squarely within CoreCivic’s control: that his personal property (a canteen) was seized and never returned; that a CoreCivic corrections officer is racially biased against white people and should be “removed”; and that grievance forms are…”
Trujillo v. Williams (10th Cir. 2006). “§§ 77 -28a-1 to 77-28a-5; Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, §§ 1601 to 1610; Va.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.