(a) Whenever a probationer is placed in the custody of the Commissioner, the court shall
furnish the Commissioner with a warrant setting forth the name of the probationer,
the nature of the crime of which he or she was convicted, the date and place of trial
and sentence, the sentence imposed, the order of the court committing him or her to
the charge of the Commissioner, and the conditions of his or her release.
(b) The warrant shall be full authority for the exercise by the Commissioner of all the
rights and powers over and in relation to the probationer prescribed by law and by
the order of the court.
(c) The warrant shall be sufficient authority for the apprehension and detention of the
probationer by the Commissioner or by any officer acting under his or her direction
at any time or place. (Added 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 20.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1982–1998 · leading case: State v. Therrien, 442 A.2d 1299 (Vt. 1982).
State v. Therrien, 442 A.2d 1299 (Vt. 1982). “The sole issue here is whether under the statute the sentence is considered to be imposed at the time of the original sen- *627 tenting or at the time the defendant is found in violation of probation.”
State v. Wargo, 719 A.2d 407 (Vt. 1998). “” Defendant cites 28 V.S.A. § 203, which provides that: (a) Whenever a probationer is placed in the custody of the commissioner, the court shall furnish the commissioner with a warrant.”
State v. St. Francis, 628 A.2d 556 (Vt. 1993). “28 V.S.A. § 203(a). The warrant “shall be sufficient authority for the apprehension and detention of the probationer by the commissioner .”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 203(a) — 2 cases
State v. Therrien, 442 A.2d 1299 (Vt. 1982). “The sole issue here is whether under the statute the sentence is considered to be imposed at the time of the original sen- *627 tenting or at the time the defendant is found in violation of probation.”
State v. St. Francis, 628 A.2d 556 (Vt. 1993). “28 V.S.A. § 203(a). The warrant “shall be sufficient authority for the apprehension and detention of the probationer by the commissioner .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.