Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 801 (2026)

Medical care of inmates

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : CARE OF INMATES

(Cite as: 28 V.S.A. § 801)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1976–2026 · leading case: Patrick Mullinnex . v. Lisa Menard, 2020 VT 33 (Vt. 2020).
Patrick Mullinnex . v. Lisa Menard, 2020 VT 33 (Vt. 2020). · cites it 3× “Pursuant to 28 V.S.A. § 801(a), the DOC must “provide health care for inmates in accordance with the prevailing medical standards.”
Battick v. Stoneman, 421 F. Supp. 213 (D. Vt. 1976). · cites it 2× “The plaintiff asserts that 28 V.S.A. § 801, 16 which requires the correctional department to establish and maintain services for its inmates is violated by the ministering to his special medical needs in medical facilities maintained by the Bureau of Prisons, outside of Vermont.”
Hebert v. State, 679 A.2d 887 (Vt. 1996). “§ 601(3), which requires supervisors “[t]o take proper measures to protect the safety of the inmates,” and 28 VS.A. § 801(a), which requires the Corrections Department to “provide health care for inmates in accordance with the prevailing medical standards.”
Taylor v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). · cites it 9× “" 28 V.S.A. § 801(a). At the merits hearing, Mr.”
currier v. deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 6× “” 28 V.S.A. § 801 (a). Issues of whether the Department has met this standard in providing specific medical care to an inmate may be appealed and reviewed under Rule 75.”
wool v. bullard (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 4× “Wool claims that his current inability to participate in VIPSA violates 28 V.S.A. §§ 801 and 907, and chapter 1, article 18 of the Vermont Constitution.”
Maniery v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 3× “Although the Department ultimately has discretion to determine what level or nature of health care satisfies “prevailing medical standards,” the Department must take some rational action in order to make that determination for inmates under the Department custody and care.”
Wool v. Bullard (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). · cites it 4× “Wool claims that his current inability to participate in VTPSA violates 28 V.S.A. §§ 801 and 907, and chapter 1, article 18 of the Vermont Constitution.”
Beyor v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 2× “28 V.S.A. § 801(a). To be clear, Mr. Beyor does not claim insufficient treatment for his conditions generally—he specifically claims that, to comply with § 801(a), the DOC must give him these two specific prescriptions in the requested amounts.”
Zazzali v. VitalCore Health Strategies, LLC (D. Vt. 2025). · cites it 2× “5 at 8, ¶ 45); 28 V.S.A. § 801 (“The Department shall provide health care for inmates in accordance with the prevailing medical standards.”
Gilbeau v. Vermont Dept. of Corr. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “Plaintiff next argues that he should not have to exhaust because the Department allowed him a tomato-free diet at a different institution, and because he need not exhaust where the matter concerns health care, which is controlled by 28 V.S.A. § 801(a). Neither argument is…”
crannell v. pallito (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023). “28 V.S.A. § 801(a), “Medical Care of Inmates,” provides that “The Department shall provide health care for inmates in accordance with the prevailing medical standards.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 801(a) — 13 cases
Patrick Mullinnex . v. Lisa Menard, 2020 VT 33 (Vt. 2020). “Pursuant to 28 V.S.A. § 801(a), the DOC must “provide health care for inmates in accordance with the prevailing medical standards.”
Hebert v. State, 679 A.2d 887 (Vt. 1996). “§ 601(3), which requires supervisors “[t]o take proper measures to protect the safety of the inmates,” and 28 VS.A. § 801(a), which requires the Corrections Department to “provide health care for inmates in accordance with the prevailing medical standards.”
Taylor v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “" 28 V.S.A. § 801(a). At the merits hearing, Mr.”
currier v. deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “” 28 V.S.A. § 801 (a). Issues of whether the Department has met this standard in providing specific medical care to an inmate may be appealed and reviewed under Rule 75.”
Beyor v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “28 V.S.A. § 801(a). To be clear, Mr. Beyor does not claim insufficient treatment for his conditions generally—he specifically claims that, to comply with § 801(a), the DOC must give him these two specific prescriptions in the requested amounts.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 801(c) — 1 case
Nash v. Wennar, 645 F. Supp. 238 (D. Vt. 1986).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 801(d) — 1 case
Maniery v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “Although the Department ultimately has discretion to determine what level or nature of health care satisfies “prevailing medical standards,” the Department must take some rational action in order to make that determination for inmates under the Department custody and care.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 801(e) — 1 case
Patrick Mullinnex . v. Lisa Menard, 2020 VT 33 (Vt. 2020). “Pursuant to 28 V.S.A. § 801(a), the DOC must “provide health care for inmates in accordance with the prevailing medical standards.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 801(e)(4) — 1 case
Zazzali v. VitalCore Health Strategies, LLC (D. Vt. 2025). “5 at 8, ¶ 45); 28 V.S.A. § 801 (“The Department shall provide health care for inmates in accordance with the prevailing medical standards.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.