Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 29, § 171 (2026)

Responsibility for security

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(Cite as: 29 V.S.A. § 171)

§ 171. Responsibility for security

(a) The Commissioner of Buildings and General Services shall be responsible for ensuring the security of all State facilities, regardless of funding source for construction or renovation, the lands upon which those facilities are located, and the occupants of those facilities and places, except that:

(1) in those State-owned or State-leased buildings that house a court plus one or more other functions, security for the space occupied by the court shall be under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and security elsewhere shall be under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Buildings and General Services;

(2) in those buildings which function exclusively as courthouses, security shall be under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court;

(3) the space occupied by the Supreme Court shall be under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court; and

(4) in the State House, security shall be under the jurisdiction of the Sergeant at Arms.

(b) The Commissioner of Buildings and General Services shall develop a security plan for each facility, except for those under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and of the Sergeant at Arms, and shall regularly update these plans as necessary and be responsible for coordinating responses to all security needs. The Supreme Court and the Sergeant at Arms shall, in cooperation with the Commissioner of Buildings and General Services, prepare and update such plans for the facilities under their respective jurisdictions.

(c) The Commissioner of Buildings and General Services may delegate the responsibility for security at specified facilities.

(d) All security improvements to State facilities shall be under the direction of the Commissioner of Buildings and General Services, who shall set statewide standards for policies, materials, and equipment, including voice and data reception and transmission upgrades and installations.

(e) Under this section, the Commissioner of Buildings and General Services is responsible for the protection of State facilities, the lands upon which the facilities are situated, and the occupants of those facilities, which is vital to sustaining the essential services of government in an emergency. The Commissioner shall develop plans for continuity of government and continuity of operations as an addendum to the State emergency operations plan maintained by the Department of Public Safety, Division of Emergency Management and referenced in 20 V.S.A. § 8(b)(2).

(f) The Commissioner of Buildings and General Services, the Sergeant at Arms, and the Court Administrator shall execute a memorandum of understanding to coordinate the provision of security plans and law enforcement services within the Capitol Complex. The memorandum of understanding shall incorporate any existing agreements related to the provision of law enforcement services or security in the Capitol Complex. As used in this section, “Capitol Complex” has the same meaning as used in section 182 of this title. (Added 1999, No. 29, § 44, eff. May 19, 1999; amended 2001, No. 149 (Adj. Sess.), § 29, eff. June 27, 2002; 2015, No. 88 (Adj. Sess.), § 3, eff. May 6, 2016.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 2002–2004 · leading case: Huminski v. Corsones, 386 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Huminski v. Corsones, 386 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “See Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 29, § 171 . 25 Vermont *140 law also allows state courts to take certain actions to “secure both the proper transaction and dispatch of business and the respect and obedience due to the court and necessary for the administration of justice.”

Huminski v. Corsones, 396 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “See Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 29, § 171 . 25 Vermont *77 law also allows state courts to take certain actions to “secure both the proper transaction and dispatch of business and the respect and obedience due to the court and necessary for the administration of justice.”

Huminski v. Rutland Cnty. Sheriff's Dept., 211 F. Supp. 2d 520 (D. Vt. 2002). · cites it 3× “[19] Defendant Elrick is a deputy sheriff and employee of the Rutland County Sheriff's Department.”

Huminski v. Rutland Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 211 F. Supp. 2d 520 (D. Vt. 2002). · cites it 3× “19 Defendant Elrick is a deputy sheriff and employee of the Rutland County Sheriffs Department.”

— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 29, § 171(a)(1) — 2 cases

Huminski v. Rutland Cnty. Sheriff's Dept., 211 F. Supp. 2d 520 (D. Vt. 2002). “[19] Defendant Elrick is a deputy sheriff and employee of the Rutland County Sheriff's Department.”

Huminski v. Rutland Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 211 F. Supp. 2d 520 (D. Vt. 2002). “19 Defendant Elrick is a deputy sheriff and employee of the Rutland County Sheriffs Department.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.