The Supreme Court may reverse or affirm the judgments, orders, or decrees of the Commission
and may remand a cause to it with such mandates, as law or equity shall require; and
the Commission shall enter judgment, order, or decree in accordance with such mandates.
The transfer of the cause to the Supreme Court shall not vacate any judgment, order,
or decree of the Commission, but the Supreme Court or, when not in session, a Justice
thereof upon notice to interested parties, may suspend execution of the same as justice
and equity require, unless otherwise specifically provided by law; provided, however,
that the execution of rate orders shall not be suspended at the request of a utility
unless the utility files with the Commission a bond running to the members of the
Commission and their successors in office in an amount and with sureties approved
by the Court or a Justice thereof conditioned that within 30 days after the termination
of the proceedings the company shall repay to the persons from whom collected and
after the effective date of the Commission’s final order all sums in excess of the
rates finally determined to be just and reasonable. (Amended 1959, No. 329 (Adj. Sess.), § 39(b), eff. March 1, 1961; 1961, No. 263, § 4(c), eff. July 31, 1961.)
In Re New England Tel. & Tel. Co., 305 A.2d 598 (Vt. 1973). · cites it 4דIn opposition, the right is claimed to be heard as an appeal from a final order under that same § 12, with the additional right, under 30 V.S.A. § 14, to seek a suspension of the board’s rate order under bond.”
Petition of Allied Power & Light Co., 326 A.2d 160 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 2ד§ 815, 30 V.S.A. § 14, and V.R.A.P. 8. Consistent with the appellate nature of the forum, no testimony was taken, but briefs were filed and argument had, supplemented by submission of relevant portions of the record below and transcripts of testimony as well by factual matter…”
Petition of Allied Power & Light Co., 321 A.2d 7 (Vt. 1974). “Based on evidence produced at a hearing on the issue, as well as the legal considerations involved, including 30 V.S.A. § 14, the Board refused to order a stay.”
Moore v. Gilbert, 321 A.2d 13 (Vt. 1974). “Turning next to 30 V.S.A. § 14, we find the prohibition against a stay or vacation of the Public Service Board’s order repeated in the following language: The supreme court may reverse or affirm the judgments, orders or decrees of the board and may remand *367 a cause to it with…”
Chelsea Solar v. Puc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “See also 30 V.S.A. § 14 (“The Supreme Court may reverse or affirm the judgments, orders, or decrees of the Commission and may remand a cause to it with such mandates, as law or equity shall require; and the Commission shall enter judgment, order, or decree in accordance with…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.