A complaint to the Public Utility Commission may be made against a company subject
to supervision under the provisions of this chapter concerning any claimed unlawful
act or neglect adversely affecting the complainant, who may be a company or five or
more individuals or, if less than five are so affected, then any one of them. The
complainant may bring his or her complaint directly before the Commission or he or
she may file his or her complaint with the Department of Public Service, which shall
investigate such complaint and, if sufficient cause exists, shall prosecute the same
in the name of the State. Upon request of the trustees of an incorporated village
or the selectboard or city council or upon its own motion, the Department of Public
Service may institute investigations regarding the price, toll, rate, or rental charged
by any utility. (Amended 1959, No. 329 (Adj. Sess.), § 39(b), eff. March 1, 1961; 1979, No. 204 (Adj. Sess.), § 24, eff. Feb. 1, 1981.)
In re Petition of GMPSolar-Richmond, LLC (Allco Renewable Energy Ltd., Appellant), 179 A.3d 1232 (Vt. 2017). · cites it 2ד104(A) 2 with respect to pursuing PPAs through the designated purchasing agent for Vermont utilities, and under 30 V.S.A. § 208 to the extent Allco suggested that GMP had violated a rule or statute or otherwise infringed on Allco's rights under PURPA.”
Petition of Allied Power & Light Co., 321 A.2d 7 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 3דIt also treated the petition as a request by petitioner as a filing for a change in their tariffs under the provisions of 30 V.S.A. §§ 208, 209, 218, 219, 225, 226, and 227.”
Carpenter v. Home Tel. Co., 163 A.2d 838 (Vt. 1960). · cites it 2דThe manner in which an individual requests review by the commission of a claimed unlawful act or neglect by a company is set out in 30 V.S.A. §208. Where, as here, relief is sought by petition under these statutory provisions, the public service commission has authority to…”
In Re Vermont Pub. Power Supply Auth., 440 A.2d 140 (Vt. 1981). “30 V.S.A. § 208 allows a single company or five individuals to attack utility practices.”
Westover v. Vill. of Barton Elec. Dept., 543 A.2d 698 (Vt. 1988). “30 V.S.A. § 208, for example, provides that a complaint may be made to the Board concerning “any claimed unlawful act” of a company subject to the Board’s supervision.”
Ratepayers Coalition of Rochester v. Rochester Elec. Light & Power Co., 571 A.2d 606 (Vt. 1989). “We affirmed that denial in an unpublished entry order on February 5, 1988, on grounds that the proper forum was the Public Service Board (PSB) acting under 30 V.S.A. § 208. Petitioners then sought temporary and permanent injunctions from the PSB, challenging rates approved by…”
Petition of Allied Power & Light Co., 350 A.2d 360 (Vt. 1975). · cites it 2דThe Public Service Board certified the following two questions for review: (1) Whether the filings made by certain electric utilities listed in Appendix I of the Findings and Second Supplemental Order of the Public Service Board, dated May 20, 1974, qualify as valid rates under…”
Arlington Selectmen v. Arlington Water Co., 394 A.2d 1130 (Vt. 1978). “In September, 1977, the selectmen of the Town of Arlington and five other customers brought a complaint before the Public Service Board, under 30 V.S.A. § 208, against Arlington Water Company, a privately owned utility operating a water supply system in Arlington.”
North v. City of Burlington Elec. Light Dep't, 214 A.2d 82 (Vt. 1965). “The specific authority to adjudicate the present controversy is found in 30 V.S.A. §§ 208, 209 (4). Upon complaint by a consumer adversely affected by a claimed unlawful act on the part of the utility, on due notice to the public service corporation, the board has jurisdiction…”
In re Vill. of Morrisville Water & Light Dep't, 365 A.2d 525 (Vt. 1976). “30 V.S.A. §§ 208, 209, 218, 219, and 229, viewed together, gave the Board ample authority to thwart such an objective, and it quite properly did so.”
Petition of Milton Water Corp., 218 A.2d 710 (Vt. 1966). “” Under the provisions of 30 V.S.A. §223 new rate schedules must be filed with the board thirty days prior to the time the same are to take effect.”
Westover v. Vill. of Barton Elec. Dept., 543 A.2d 698 (Vt. 1988). “30 V.S.A. § 208, for example, provides that a complaint may be made to the Board concerning "any claimed unlawful act" of a company subject to the Board's supervision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.