Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 218 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL POWERS

(Cite as: 30 V.S.A. § 218)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases, 1973–2018 · leading case: Petition of Green Mountain Power Corp., 305 A.2d 571 (Vt. 1973).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Petition of Green Mountain Power Corp., 305 A.2d 571 (Vt. 1973). · cites it 5× “The question pertaining to the fuel adjustment clause as framed by the public and certified by the Public Service Board pursuant to V.”
In Re Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 769 A.2d 668 (Vt. 2001). “See 30 V.S.A. § 218(a) (Board may change unreasonable or unjust rate); 30 V.”
In Re Tariff Filing of Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 711 A.2d 1158 (Vt. 1998). · cites it 4× “In May 1995, CVPS filed a proposal with the Board to redesign its rates under 30 VS.A. §§ 218 and 225. Appellants later received limited permission to intervene.”
In Re Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 473 A.2d 1155 (Vt. 1984). · cites it 2× “In discharging its duty to set rates that are “just and reasonable,” 30 V.S.A. § 218, the Board has no statutory authority to make whole either the utility company or its customers for inequities that existed in the past.”
In Re Consol. Rate Appeals of Green Mountain Power Corp., 455 A.2d 823 (Vt. 1983). · cites it 2× “30 V.S.A. § 218 authorizes the Board to set rates, tolls, charges or schedules or to change regulations, measurements, practices or acts of the utility relating to its service in order to insure those reasonable rates and adequate service.”
In Re New England Tel. & Tel. Co., 382 A.2d 826 (Vt. 1977). · cites it 2× “The Board’s finding quoted above is essentially a finding in the statutory language of 30 V.S.A. § 218 unaccompanied by any factual supporting statements as required by 3 V.”
Petition of Allied Power & Light Co., 321 A.2d 7 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 2× “55 satisfied the test of “just and reasonable” of 30 V.S.A. § 218. The first challenge to General Order No.”
In Re Investigation Into the Existing Rates of Vermont Tel. Co., 739 A.2d 671 (Vt. 1999). · cites it 3× “1 The Board, in setting just and reasonable rates pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 218, recognizes these prepayments and makes adjustments to reflect the cost-free capital.”
Petition of Cent. Vt. Pub. Serv. Corp., 449 A.2d 904 (Vt. 1982). “Finally, the company challenges the recoupment order, claiming that the method for calculating recoupment was inappropriate.”
In re Tariff Filing of New England Tel. & Tel. Co., 488 A.2d 746 (Vt. 1984). “In support of the Board’s action, NET points to the general irate case that was under consideration concurrently with the instant proceeding, and argues that the general rate case gave the Board and the parties a full opportunity to address all of the rate-making factors which…”
Petition of Vermont Welfare Rights Org., 326 A.2d 828 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 3× “To substitute its regulations for those which a utility has previously adopted and filed, the Board must first find the individual company’s regulations to be unjust, unreasonable, insufficient, unjustly discriminatory, or preferential under 30 V.S.A. § 218. The Board’s finding…”
In Re Vill. of Hardwick Elec. Dep't, 466 A.2d 1180 (Vt. 1983). “” 30 V.S.A. § 218. In addition to this long-standing guideline, § 2923 (a) echoes the mandate that the rate of return on capital investments of a municipal plant shall be “reasonable.”
Show all 26 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 218(a) — 8 cases
In Re Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 769 A.2d 668 (Vt. 2001). “See 30 V.S.A. § 218(a) (Board may change unreasonable or unjust rate); 30 V.”
In Re Tariff Filing of Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 711 A.2d 1158 (Vt. 1998). “In May 1995, CVPS filed a proposal with the Board to redesign its rates under 30 VS.A. §§ 218 and 225. Appellants later received limited permission to intervene.”
In Re Investigation Into the Existing Rates of Vermont Tel. Co., 739 A.2d 671 (Vt. 1999). “1 The Board, in setting just and reasonable rates pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 218, recognizes these prepayments and makes adjustments to reflect the cost-free capital.”
In Re Citizens Utils. Co., 769 A.2d 19 (Vt. 2000).
Petition of Telesystems, Corp., 469 A.2d 1169 (Vt. 1983).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.