Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 30 Chapter 5
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 225 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL POWERS

(Cite as: 30 V.S.A. § 225)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1966–2001 · leading case: Petition of Allied Power & Light Co., 321 A.2d 7 (Vt. 1974).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Petition of Allied Power & Light Co., 321 A.2d 7 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 6× “Whether the filing of the January 19, 1978 Petition for the initiation of the rule-making proceedings with the Board constituted a filing of rate changes in compliance with 30 V.S.A. § 225. The most crucial of the seven questions advanced on appeal is as to whether the purchase…”
Ratepayers Coalition of Rochester v. Rochester Elec. Light & Power Co., 571 A.2d 606 (Vt. 1989). · cites it 6× “In fact, 30 V.S.A. § 225 leaves that to the decision of the Board.”
In Re Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 473 A.2d 1155 (Vt. 1984). · cites it 3× “30 V.S.A. § 225 (b). If the Board accepts the change, the changed rate will take effect as scheduled, and there will be no further proceedings.”
In Re Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 769 A.2d 668 (Vt. 2001). “§ 227(b) (Board may order investigation of justness and reasonableness of rates); 30 V.S.A. § 225(a) (company may file for change in rate by giving forty-five days notice).”
Petition of Cent. Vt. Pub. Serv. Corp., 449 A.2d 904 (Vt. 1982). “See 30 V.S.A. § 225 (a). The rates filed by the company go into effect unless suspended by the Board.”
In Re Tariff Filing of Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 711 A.2d 1158 (Vt. 1998). · cites it 2× “2d 606, 607-09 (1989) (compliance with 30 V.S.A. § 225 notice requirements satisfies due process).”
Petition of Allied Power & Light Co., 350 A.2d 360 (Vt. 1975). · cites it 4× “30 V.S.A. § 225 requires a utility to file schedules with the Public Service Board showing all rates and rules affecting rates charged for its services or product.”
In re Green Mountain Power Corp. Rate Filing, 428 A.2d 1134 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 6× “The pertinent part of 30 V.S.A. § 225 provides as follows: A change shall not thereafter be made in any such schedules, including schedules of joint rates or in any such rules and regulations, except upon thirty days’ notice to the board and such notice to parties affected by…”
In Re New England Tel. & Tel. Co., 305 A.2d 598 (Vt. 1973). “30 V.S.A. § 225. Initiative then shifts to the board, which may, up to six days before the effective date of the new rates, order an investigation of the justness and reasonableness of the change.”
Petition of Green Mountain Power Corp., 519 A.2d 595 (Vt. 1986). “Green Mountain Power Corporation (GMP) filed a notice of change in rates on January 5, 1984, pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 225. The Department appeared as a statutory party, 1 and VPIRG was granted intervenor status.”
Petition of Vermont Welfare Rights Org., 326 A.2d 828 (Vt. 1974). “57 have filed their disconnect regulations with the Board under 30 V.S.A. § 225. In this Order, the Board requires' the utilities to file revisions of any of their *626 previous disconnect regulations inconsistent with the terms of the Order.”
Investigation Into Three Special Contracts Filed by New England Tel. & Tel. Co., 779 A.2d 693 (Vt. 2001). “30 V.S.A. § 225(a), and cannot be unjustly discriminatory, see 30 V.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 225(a) — 6 cases
In Re Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 769 A.2d 668 (Vt. 2001). “§ 227(b) (Board may order investigation of justness and reasonableness of rates); 30 V.S.A. § 225(a) (company may file for change in rate by giving forty-five days notice).”
Ratepayers Coalition of Rochester v. Rochester Elec. Light & Power Co., 571 A.2d 606 (Vt. 1989). “In fact, 30 V.S.A. § 225 leaves that to the decision of the Board.”
In Re Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 473 A.2d 1155 (Vt. 1984). “30 V.S.A. § 225 (b). If the Board accepts the change, the changed rate will take effect as scheduled, and there will be no further proceedings.”
In Re Tariff Filing of Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 711 A.2d 1158 (Vt. 1998). “2d 606, 607-09 (1989) (compliance with 30 V.S.A. § 225 notice requirements satisfies due process).”
Investigation Into Three Special Contracts Filed by New England Tel. & Tel. Co., 779 A.2d 693 (Vt. 2001). “30 V.S.A. § 225(a), and cannot be unjustly discriminatory, see 30 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.