Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 32 Chapter 124
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3758 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : AGRICULTURAL LAND AND MANAGED FORESTLAND USE VALUE APPRAISAL PROGRAM

(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 3758)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2005–2016 · leading case: Plum Creek Maine Timberlands, LLC v. Vermont Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec. & Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2016 VT 103 (Vt. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Plum Creek Maine Timberlands, LLC v. Vermont Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec. & Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2016 VT 103 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 15× “Plum Creek appealed that decision to the PVR Director 5 pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 3758(a),3 contesting removal of the entire 56,604-acre tract from the program rather than the 470 acres that comprised the harvest area.”
Mollica v. Div. of Prop. Valuation & Review, 2008 VT 60 (Vt. 2008). “In relevant part, 32 V.S.A. § 3758(a) provides that appeals from the director’s decisions concerning the current-use program proceed “in the same manner and under the same procedures” as tax appeals from a board of civil authority.”
Goodrum v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2014 VT 128 (Vt. 2014). “32 V.S.A. § 3758(a). The Goodrums raised no claim with respect to this appeal route.”
In re Appeal of Plum Creek Maine Timberlands, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “32 V.S.A. § 3758; Id. § 4467; Kruse v. Town of Westford, 145 Vt.”
Egan v. Dep't of Taxes (Vt. Super. Ct. 2005). “Each section presumes that the appealing taxpayer is challenging a specific decision by the Tax Department, such as a denial of a Use Value application (32 V.S.A. § 3758(a)), a determination of the land’s fair market value (§ 3758(b)), or an appraisal made by the Department (32…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3758(a) — 4 cases
Plum Creek Maine Timberlands, LLC v. Vermont Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec. & Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2016 VT 103 (Vt. 2016). “Plum Creek appealed that decision to the PVR Director 5 pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 3758(a),3 contesting removal of the entire 56,604-acre tract from the program rather than the 470 acres that comprised the harvest area.”
Mollica v. Div. of Prop. Valuation & Review, 2008 VT 60 (Vt. 2008). “In relevant part, 32 V.S.A. § 3758(a) provides that appeals from the director’s decisions concerning the current-use program proceed “in the same manner and under the same procedures” as tax appeals from a board of civil authority.”
Goodrum v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2014 VT 128 (Vt. 2014). “32 V.S.A. § 3758(a). The Goodrums raised no claim with respect to this appeal route.”
Egan v. Dep't of Taxes (Vt. Super. Ct. 2005). “Each section presumes that the appealing taxpayer is challenging a specific decision by the Tax Department, such as a denial of a Use Value application (32 V.S.A. § 3758(a)), a determination of the land’s fair market value (§ 3758(b)), or an appraisal made by the Department (32…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3758(d) — 1 case
Plum Creek Maine Timberlands, LLC v. Vermont Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec. & Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2016 VT 103 (Vt. 2016). “Plum Creek appealed that decision to the PVR Director 5 pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 3758(a),3 contesting removal of the entire 56,604-acre tract from the program rather than the 470 acres that comprised the harvest area.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.