On or before May 20, the listers shall meet at the place so designated by them and
on that day and from day to day thereafter shall hear persons aggrieved by their appraisals
or by any of their acts until all questions and objections are heard and decided.
Listers shall add to the aforesaid abstract certificates setting forth such corrections
therein as they shall determine and shall forward to each taxpayer a copy of any certificate
relating to his or her list. Such hearings shall not be held later than June 2. (Amended 1983, No. 85, § 7.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1983–1989 · leading case: Bargman v. Brewer, 454 A.2d 1253 (Vt. 1983).
Bargman v. Brewer, 454 A.2d 1253 (Vt. 1983). · cites it 2דShould a grievant remain dissatisfied with the decision of the board, a further appeal for a de novo hearing is permitted to the superior court or to the director of property valuation, see 32 V.”
Alexander v. Town of Barton, 565 A.2d 1294 (Vt. 1989). “The Alexanders appealed the appraisal to the Board of Listers pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 4221, but no change was made in the assessment.”
Roy v. Town of Barnet, 522 A.2d 225 (Vt. 1986). “Pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 4221, plaintiff appeared at the grievance hearing to appeal the appraisal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.