Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 4468 (2026)

Transmission and record of determination

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : TO DIRECTOR OR TO SUPERIOR COURT

(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 4468)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1973–2023 · leading case: Shetland Props., Inc. v. Town of Poultney, 484 A.2d 929 (Vt. 1984).
Shetland Props., Inc. v. Town of Poultney, 484 A.2d 929 (Vt. 1984). · cites it 4× “32 V.S.A. § 4468. * In August of 1979, plaintiff sold off 10.”
City of Barre v. Town of Orange, 430 A.2d 444 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 5× “Under 32 V.S.A. § 4468 the appraisal set by the Board is normally effective for the year in question and for the two succeeding years.”
Town of Castleton v. Parento, 2009 VT 65 (Vt. 2009). · cites it 2× “Having determined on a final appeal on the merits that taxpayer is entitled to have his 2006 grand list figure reinstated, we further hold that, pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 4468, this figure “shall become the basis for the grand list of .”
Bloomer v. Town of Danby, 370 A.2d 194 (Vt. 1977). “32 V.S.A. § 4468. Judgment vacated and cause remanded with instruction.”
In Re Appeal of City of Barre, 365 A.2d 519 (Vt. 1976). “That court, over objections to its jurisdiction, dismissed the petition on its merits, finding that the board had substantially complied with all statutory and constitutional requirements, and that the provisions of 32 V.”
Heindel v. Town of Grafton, 435 A.2d 695 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 4468 this appraisal was fixed for the two ensuing years, 1977 and 1978.”
Amodeo v. Town of Readsboro, 401 A.2d 902 (Vt. 1979). · cites it 2× “The Board’s determination was forwarded to each taxpayer and town clerk in accordance with 32 V.S.A. § 4468. By notice of appeal dated September 22,1977, the Town seeks to have us review the Board’s determinations, which it claims are erroneous in each individual case.”
Burton v. Town of Salisbury, 790 A.2d 394 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 6× “Principally, taxpayers argued that an appeal on the merits might afford them a three year remedy under 32 V.S.A. § 4468. That section provides that a determination by the Board of the value of the property “shall become the basis for the grand list of the taxpayer for the year…”
TransCanada Hydro Ne. Inc. v. Town of Vernon (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011). · cites it 2× “TransCanada has moves for summary judgment claiming that the so-called “Freeze Act” (32 V.S.A. § 4468) requires that the listed value of the property as of April 1, 2010 be set at the value determined by the Director as of April 1, 2009.”
fox v. bridgewater (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023). “Pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 4468, the fair market value for the property for 2012, 2013, and 2014 is $30,000, subject to other terms of that statute that may affect the 2014 value.”
In re Dunn, 310 A.2d 22 (Vt. 1973). “” This statute clearly protects the remedy and proceedings of the appellants as they existed before the amendment to 32 V.S.A. § 4468, which was not effective until March 29, 1972.”
Fox v. Town of Bridgewater (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “Pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 4468, the fair market value for the property for 2012, 2013, and 2014 is $30,000, subject to other terms of that statute that may affect the 2014 value.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.