Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 4921 (2026)

Department’s records of abuse and neglect

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : REPORTING ABUSE OF CHILDREN

(Cite as: 33 V.S.A. § 4921)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2010–2026 · leading case: In Re Beer, 2010 VT 31 (Vt. 2010).
In Re Beer, 2010 VT 31 (Vt. 2010). “See 33 V.S.A. § 4921(c)(2) (referencing § 4916a(d), which requires the disclosure of redacted documents only when an administrative review conference is going to take place).”
Johnson v. Winters Tomasi (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 6× “Johnson has repeatedly requested that DCF disclose to her the relevant “redacted investigation files” pursuant to 33 V.S.A. § 4921(c)(1) (parental right to redacted investigation files), but the production has largely been refused.”
Johnson v. Winters (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). · cites it 3× “33 V.S.A. § 4921. While it has given parents the right to obtain this information, it has made that right conditional and subject to the broad discretion of DCF/DAIL.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 4921(c)(1) — 2 cases
Johnson v. Winters Tomasi (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “Johnson has repeatedly requested that DCF disclose to her the relevant “redacted investigation files” pursuant to 33 V.S.A. § 4921(c)(1) (parental right to redacted investigation files), but the production has largely been refused.”
Johnson v. Winters (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “33 V.S.A. § 4921. While it has given parents the right to obtain this information, it has made that right conditional and subject to the broad discretion of DCF/DAIL.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 4921(c)(2) — 1 case
In Re Beer, 2010 VT 31 (Vt. 2010). “See 33 V.S.A. § 4921(c)(2) (referencing § 4916a(d), which requires the disclosure of redacted documents only when an administrative review conference is going to take place).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 4921(d)(6) — 1 case
Johnson v. Winters Tomasi (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “Johnson has repeatedly requested that DCF disclose to her the relevant “redacted investigation files” pursuant to 33 V.S.A. § 4921(c)(1) (parental right to redacted investigation files), but the production has largely been refused.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 4921(e)(1) — 1 case
Johnson v. Winters Tomasi (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “Johnson has repeatedly requested that DCF disclose to her the relevant “redacted investigation files” pursuant to 33 V.S.A. § 4921(c)(1) (parental right to redacted investigation files), but the production has largely been refused.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.