(a) On motion of a party or on the court’s own motion, the court may make an order restraining
or otherwise controlling the conduct of a person if the court finds that such conduct
is or may be detrimental or harmful to a child.
(b) The person against whom the order is directed shall be served with notice of the motion
and the grounds therefor and be given an opportunity to be heard.
(c) Upon a showing that there is a risk of immediate harm to a child, the court may issue
a protective order ex parte. A hearing on the motion shall be held no more than 10
days after the issuance of the order.
(d) The court may review any protective order at a subsequent hearing to determine whether
the order should remain in effect.
(e) A person who is the subject of an order issued pursuant to this section and who intentionally
violates a provision of the order that concerns contact between the child and that
person shall be punished in accordance with 13 V.S.A. § 1030. (Added 2007, No. 185 (Adj. Sess.), § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 2009.)
In re D.F., H.F., M.F. & D.F., Juveniles, 204 A.3d 641 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 4ד33 V.S.A. § 5115(a). A person who intentionally violates such an order concerning contact between the child and that person is subject to punishment pursuant to 13 V.”
In re P.K., Juv., 2017 VT 3 (Vt. 2017). · cites it 2דprecludes relief under that provision. ¶ 12. Even though mother has taken a different tack on appeal, we first consider her argument for relief under Rule 60(b), which was the basis for her motion in the superior court.”
In Re R.B., Juv. (Vt. 2023). · cites it 4דIn early November 2022, the State moved for a protective order under 33 V.S.A. § 5115 to restrain mother from interfering with R.”
In Re N.R., Juv. (Vt. 2022). “” 33 V.S.A. § 5115(a). The protective order “will stand on appellate review unless the record indicates that the court exercised its discretion for clearly untenable reasons or to an extent clearly unreasonable.”
In Re E.M., Juv. (Vt. 2025). “See 33 V.S.A. § 5115(a) (“On motion of a party .”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5115(a) — 4 cases
In re D.F., H.F., M.F. & D.F., Juveniles, 204 A.3d 641 (Vt. 2018). “33 V.S.A. § 5115(a). A person who intentionally violates such an order concerning contact between the child and that person is subject to punishment pursuant to 13 V.”
In re P.K., Juv., 2017 VT 3 (Vt. 2017). “precludes relief under that provision. ¶ 12. Even though mother has taken a different tack on appeal, we first consider her argument for relief under Rule 60(b), which was the basis for her motion in the superior court.”
In Re N.R., Juv. (Vt. 2022). “” 33 V.S.A. § 5115(a). The protective order “will stand on appellate review unless the record indicates that the court exercised its discretion for clearly untenable reasons or to an extent clearly unreasonable.”
In Re E.M., Juv. (Vt. 2025). “See 33 V.S.A. § 5115(a) (“On motion of a party .”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 5115(e) — 1 case
In re D.F., H.F., M.F. & D.F., Juveniles, 204 A.3d 641 (Vt. 2018). “33 V.S.A. § 5115(a). A person who intentionally violates such an order concerning contact between the child and that person is subject to punishment pursuant to 13 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.