Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 50-73.112 (2026)

Purchase of dissociated partner's interest

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. If a partner is dissociated from a partnership without resulting in a dissolution and winding up of the partnership business under § 50-73.117, the partnership shall cause the dissociated partner's interest in the partnership to be purchased for a buyout price determined pursuant to subsection B.

B. The buyout price of a dissociated partner's interest is the amount that would have been distributable to the dissociating partner under subsection B of § 50-73.123 if, on the date of dissociation, the assets of the partnership were sold at a price equal to the greater of the liquidation value or the value based on a sale of the entire business as a going concern without the dissociated partner and the partnership were wound up as of that date. Interest shall be paid from the date of dissociation to the date of payment.

C. Damages for wrongful dissociation under subsection B of § 50-73.110, and all other amounts owing, whether or not presently due, from the dissociated partner to the partnership, shall be offset against the buyout price. Interest shall be paid from the date the amount owed becomes due to the date of payment.

D. A partnership shall indemnify a dissociated partner whose interest is being purchased against all partnership liabilities, whether incurred before or after the dissociation, except liabilities incurred by an act of the dissociated partner under § 50-73.113.

E. If no agreement for the purchase of a dissociated partner's interest is reached within 120 days after a written demand for payment, the partnership shall pay, or cause to be paid, in cash to the dissociated partner the amount the partnership estimates to be the buyout price and accrued interest, reduced by any offsets and accrued interest under subsection C.

F. If a deferred payment is authorized under subsection H, the partnership may tender a written offer to pay the amount it estimates to be the buyout price and accrued interest, reduced by any offsets under subsection C, stating the time of payment, the amount and type of security for payment, and the other terms and conditions of the obligation.

G. The payment or tender required by subsection E or subsection F shall be accompanied by the following:

1. A statement of partnership assets and liabilities as of the date of dissociation;

2. The latest available partnership balance sheet and income statement, if any;

3. An explanation of how the estimated amount of the payment was calculated; and

4. Written notice that the payment is in full satisfaction of the obligation to purchase unless, within 120 days after the written notice, the dissociated partner commences an action to determine the buyout price, any offsets under subsection C, or other terms of the obligation to purchase.

H. A partner who wrongfully dissociates before the expiration of a definite term or the completion of a particular undertaking is not entitled to payment of any portion of the buyout price until the expiration of the term or completion of the undertaking, unless the partner establishes to the satisfaction of the court that earlier payment will not cause undue hardship to the business of the partnership. A deferred payment shall bear interest and, to the extent it would not cause undue hardship to the partnership, be adequately secured.

I. A dissociated partner may maintain an action against the partnership, pursuant to subdivision B 2 a of § 50-73.103, to determine the buyout price of that partner's interest, any offsets under subsection C, or other terms of the obligation to purchase. The action shall be commenced within 120 days after the partnership has tendered payment or an offer to pay or within one year after written demand for payment if no payment or offer to pay is tendered. The court shall determine the buyout price of the dissociated partner's interest, any offset due under subsection C, and accrued interest, and enter judgment for any additional payment or refund. If deferred payment is authorized under subsection H, the court shall also determine the security for payment and other terms of the obligation to purchase. The court may assess reasonable attorney's fees and the fees and expenses of appraisers or other experts for a party to the action, in amounts the court finds equitable, against a party that the court finds acted arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in good faith. The finding may be based on the partnership's failure to tender payment or an offer to pay or to comply with subsection G.

1996, c. 292.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2006–2024 · leading case: Danial Selario, etc. v. Cynthia Sullivan (Va. Ct. App. 2024).
Danial Selario, etc. v. Cynthia Sullivan (Va. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 6× “In Count II, they requested a judicial buyout of their partnership interests under Code § 50-73.112. Selario filed an amended complaint soon after, asking the court to wind up the Curves LLCs’ business under Code § 13-1049.”
Danette Mertz v. Cynthia Sullivan (Va. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 6× “In Count II, they requested a judicial buyout of their partnership interests under Code § 50-73.112. Selario filed an amended complaint soon after, asking the court to wind up the Curves LLCs’ business under Code § 13-1049.”
Cynthia Sullivan v. Danial Selario, as Adm'r of the Est. of Christopher Selario, e (Va. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 6× “In Count II, they requested a judicial buyout of their partnership interests under Code § 50-73.112. Selario filed an amended complaint soon after, asking the court to wind up the Curves LLCs’ business under Code § 13-1049.”
Poco Loco, L.L.C. v. Barnes, 72 Va. Cir. 165 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 2006). · cites it 4× “Va. Code § 50-73.112(1) (2006). Nowhere in the Amended Counterclaim does Barnes allege that Moseley tendered payment for Barnes’ share or made an offer to pay Barnes for her share of the Prudential Partnership, nor does Barnes allege that a written demand for such payment was…”
Sahraeyan v. Shahkarami, 88 Va. Cir. 413 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 2014). · cites it 4× “Va. Code Ann. § 50-73.112 (A),(B), (E). In this case, the Plaintiff dissociated from the partnership when the Plaintiff gave his notice on September 31,2010.”
Stavros P. Galiotos, Individually, etc. v. Tasos A. Galiotos, Individually, etc. (Va. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “And the Revised Uniform Partnership Act treats a judicial buyout of a dissociated partner as that partner’s share of the higher of the entity’s liquidation value or its value as a going concern. Revised Uniform Partnership Act (“RUPA”) § 701(b) (Uniform Laws Comm’n 1997) (last…”
Paul Galiotos, Individually, etc. v. Tasos A. Galiotos, Individually, etc. (Va. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “And the Revised Uniform Partnership Act treats a judicial buyout of a dissociated partner as that partner’s share of the higher of the entity’s liquidation value or its value as a going concern. Revised Uniform Partnership Act (“RUPA”) § 701(b) (Uniform Laws Comm’n 1997) (last…”
— Va. Code Ann. § 50-73.112(1) — 1 case
Poco Loco, L.L.C. v. Barnes, 72 Va. Cir. 165 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 2006). “Va. Code § 50-73.112(1) (2006). Nowhere in the Amended Counterclaim does Barnes allege that Moseley tendered payment for Barnes’ share or made an offer to pay Barnes for her share of the Prudential Partnership, nor does Barnes allege that a written demand for such payment was…”
— Va. Code Ann. § 50-73.112(B) — 2 cases
Stavros P. Galiotos, Individually, etc. v. Tasos A. Galiotos, Individually, etc. (Va. Ct. App. 2024). “And the Revised Uniform Partnership Act treats a judicial buyout of a dissociated partner as that partner’s share of the higher of the entity’s liquidation value or its value as a going concern. Revised Uniform Partnership Act (“RUPA”) § 701(b) (Uniform Laws Comm’n 1997) (last…”
Paul Galiotos, Individually, etc. v. Tasos A. Galiotos, Individually, etc. (Va. Ct. App. 2024). “And the Revised Uniform Partnership Act treats a judicial buyout of a dissociated partner as that partner’s share of the higher of the entity’s liquidation value or its value as a going concern. Revised Uniform Partnership Act (“RUPA”) § 701(b) (Uniform Laws Comm’n 1997) (last…”
— Va. Code Ann. § 50-73.112(I) — 3 cases
Danial Selario, etc. v. Cynthia Sullivan (Va. Ct. App. 2024). “In Count II, they requested a judicial buyout of their partnership interests under Code § 50-73.112. Selario filed an amended complaint soon after, asking the court to wind up the Curves LLCs’ business under Code § 13-1049.”
Danette Mertz v. Cynthia Sullivan (Va. Ct. App. 2024). “In Count II, they requested a judicial buyout of their partnership interests under Code § 50-73.112. Selario filed an amended complaint soon after, asking the court to wind up the Curves LLCs’ business under Code § 13-1049.”
Cynthia Sullivan v. Danial Selario, as Adm'r of the Est. of Christopher Selario, e (Va. Ct. App. 2024). “In Count II, they requested a judicial buyout of their partnership interests under Code § 50-73.112. Selario filed an amended complaint soon after, asking the court to wind up the Curves LLCs’ business under Code § 13-1049.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.