Wash. Rev. Code » Title 10 · Chapter 10.05
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 10.05.015 (2026)

Statement of availability

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
At the time of arraignment a person charged with a violation of RCW 46.61.502 or 46.61.504 or a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor domestic violence offense may be given a statement by the court that explains the availability, operation, and effects of the deferred prosecution program.
[ 2019 c 263 s 702; 1985 c 352 s 5.]

Notes:

Findings—Intent—2019 c 263 ss 202-803: See note following RCW 10.01.240.
Effective date—2019 c 263 ss 501-504, 601, 602, and 701-708: See note following RCW 9.94A.500.
Legislative finding—Severability—1985 c 352: See notes following RCW 10.05.010.
PDF

RCW 10.05.015

Statement of availability. (Effective January 1, 2026.)

At the time of arraignment a person charged with a violation of RCW 46.61.502 or 46.61.504 or a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor domestic violence offense may be given a statement by the court that explains the availability, operation, and effects of the deferred prosecution.
[ 2024 c 306 s 12; 2019 c 263 s 702; 1985 c 352 s 5.]

Notes:

Effective date—2024 c 306: See note following RCW 9.94A.661.
Findings—Intent—2019 c 263 ss 202-803: See note following RCW 10.01.240.
Effective date—2019 c 263 ss 501-504, 601, 602, and 701-708: See note following RCW 9.94A.500.
Legislative finding—Severability—1985 c 352: See notes following RCW 10.05.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1996–1996 · leading case: Abad v. Cozza, 128 Wash. 2d 575 (Wash. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Abad v. Cozza, 128 Wash. 2d 575 (Wash. 1996). “RCW 10.05.015. A petitioner for deferred prosecution must be advised of his or her rights as an accused; the petitioner must acknowledge those rights in writing.”
Abad v. Cozza, 911 P.2d 376 (Wash. 1996). “RCW 10.05.015. A petitioner for deferred prosecution must be advised of his or her rights as an accused; the petitioner must acknowledge those rights in writing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.