Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.325 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

*** CHANGE IN 2026 *** (SEE 2681.SL) ***

*** CHANGE IN 2026 *** (SEE 1941.SL) ***

(1) There shall be a cannabis producer's license regulated by the board and subject to annual renewal. The licensee is authorized to produce: (a) Cannabis for sale at wholesale to cannabis processors and other cannabis producers; (b) immature plants or clones and seeds for sale to cooperatives as described under RCW 69.51A.250; and (c) immature plants or clones and seeds for sale to qualifying patients and designated providers as provided under RCW 69.51A.310. The production, possession, delivery, distribution, and sale of cannabis in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and the rules adopted to implement and enforce it, by a validly licensed cannabis producer, shall not be a criminal or civil offense under Washington state law. Every cannabis producer's license shall be issued in the name of the applicant, shall specify the location at which the cannabis producer intends to operate, which must be within the state of Washington, and the holder thereof shall not allow any other person to use the license. The application fee for a cannabis producer's license shall be two hundred fifty dollars. The annual fee for issuance and renewal of a cannabis producer's license shall be one thousand three hundred eighty-one dollars. A separate license shall be required for each location at which a cannabis producer intends to produce cannabis.

(2) There shall be a cannabis processor's license to process, package, and label cannabis concentrates, useable cannabis, and cannabis-infused products for sale at wholesale to cannabis processors and cannabis retailers, regulated by the board and subject to annual renewal. The processing, packaging, possession, delivery, distribution, and sale of cannabis, useable cannabis, cannabis-infused products, and cannabis concentrates in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and chapter 69.51A RCW and the rules adopted to implement and enforce these chapters, by a validly licensed cannabis processor, shall not be a criminal or civil offense under Washington state law. Every cannabis processor's license shall be issued in the name of the applicant, shall specify the location at which the licensee intends to operate, which must be within the state of Washington, and the holder thereof shall not allow any other person to use the license. The application fee for a cannabis processor's license shall be two hundred fifty dollars. The annual fee for issuance and renewal of a cannabis processor's license shall be one thousand three hundred eighty-one dollars. A separate license shall be required for each location at which a cannabis processor intends to process cannabis.

(3)(a) There shall be a cannabis retailer's license to sell cannabis concentrates, useable cannabis, and cannabis-infused products at retail in retail outlets, regulated by the board and subject to annual renewal. The possession, delivery, distribution, and sale of cannabis concentrates, useable cannabis, and cannabis-infused products in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and the rules adopted to implement and enforce it, by a validly licensed cannabis retailer, shall not be a criminal or civil offense under Washington state law. Every cannabis retailer's license shall be issued in the name of the applicant, shall specify the location of the retail outlet the licensee intends to operate, which must be within the state of Washington, and the holder thereof shall not allow any other person to use the license. The application fee for a cannabis retailer's license shall be two hundred fifty dollars. The annual fee for issuance and renewal of a cannabis retailer's license shall be one thousand three hundred eighty-one dollars. A separate license shall be required for each location at which a cannabis retailer intends to sell cannabis concentrates, useable cannabis, and cannabis-infused products.

(b) An individual retail licensee and all other persons or entities with a financial or other ownership interest in the business operating under the license are limited, in the aggregate, to holding a collective total of not more than five retail cannabis licenses.

(c)(i) A cannabis retailer's license is subject to forfeiture in accordance with rules adopted by the board pursuant to this section.

(ii) The board shall adopt rules to establish a license forfeiture process for a licensed cannabis retailer that is not fully operational and open to the public within a specified period from the date of license issuance, as established by the board, subject to the following restrictions:

(A) No cannabis retailer's license may be subject to forfeiture within the first nine months of license issuance; and

(B) The board must require license forfeiture on or before twenty-four calendar months of license issuance if a cannabis retailer is not fully operational and open to the public, unless the board determines that circumstances out of the licensee's control are preventing the licensee from becoming fully operational and that, in the board's discretion, the circumstances warrant extending the forfeiture period beyond twenty-four calendar months.

(iii) The board has discretion in adopting rules under this subsection (3)(c).

(iv) This subsection (3)(c) applies to cannabis retailer's licenses issued before and after July 23, 2017. However, no license of a cannabis retailer that otherwise meets the conditions for license forfeiture established pursuant to this subsection (3)(c) may be subject to forfeiture within the first nine calendar months of July 23, 2017.

(v) The board may not require license forfeiture if the licensee has been incapable of opening a fully operational retail cannabis business due to actions by the city, town, or county with jurisdiction over the licensee that include any of the following:

(A) The adoption of a ban or moratorium that prohibits the opening of a retail cannabis business; or

(B) The adoption of an ordinance or regulation related to zoning, business licensing, land use, or other regulatory measure that has the effect of preventing a licensee from receiving an occupancy permit from the jurisdiction or which otherwise prevents a licensed cannabis retailer from becoming operational.

(d) The board may issue cannabis retailer licenses pursuant to this chapter and RCW 69.50.335.

[ 2022 c 16 s 54; 2020 c 236 s 6; 2018 c 132 s 3. Prior: 2017 c 317 s 1; 2017 c 316 s 2; 2016 c 170 s 1; 2015 c 70 s 5; 2014 c 192 s 2; 2013 c 3 s 4 (Initiative Measure No. 502, approved November 6, 2012).]

Notes:

Intent—Finding—2022 c 16: See note following RCW 69.50.101.

Findings—Intent—2020 c 236: See note following RCW 69.50.335.

Effective date—2018 c 132 s 3: "Section 3 of this act takes effect July 1, 2018." [ 2018 c 132 s 4.]

Findings—2025 c 58; 2017 c 317: "The legislature finds that protecting the state's children, youth, and young adults under the legal age to purchase and consume cannabis, by establishing limited restrictions on the advertising of cannabis and cannabis products, is necessary to assist the state's efforts to discourage and prevent underage consumption and the potential risks associated with underage consumption. The legislature finds that these restrictions assist the state in maintaining a strong and effective regulatory and enforcement system as specified by the federal government. The legislature finds this act leaves ample opportunities for licensed cannabis businesses to market their products to those who are of legal age to purchase them, without infringing on the free speech rights of business owners. Finally, the legislature finds that the state has a substantial and compelling interest in enacting this act aimed at protecting Washington's children, youth, and young adults." [ 2025 c 58 s 4005; 2017 c 317 s 12.]

Application—2017 c 317: "This act applies prospectively only and not retroactively. It applies only to causes of action that arise (if change is substantive) or that are commenced (if change is procedural) on or after July 23, 2017." [ 2017 c 317 s 25.]

Effective date—2017 c 316 ss 2 and 3: "Sections 2 and 3 of this act take effect July 1, 2018." [ 2017 c 316 s 4.]

Effective date—2016 c 170: "This act takes effect July 1, 2016." [ 2016 c 170 s 3.]

Short title—Findings—Intent—References to Washington state liquor control board—Draft legislation—2015 c 70: See notes following RCW 66.08.012.

Intent—2013 c 3 (Initiative Measure No. 502): See note following RCW 69.50.101.

*** CHANGE IN 2026 *** (SEE 2681.SL) ***

*** CHANGE IN 2026 *** (SEE 1941.SL) ***

(b)(i) An individual retail licensee and all other persons or entities with a financial or other ownership interest in the business operating under the license are limited, in the aggregate, to holding a collective total of not more than five retail cannabis licenses.

(ii) A retail licensee and all other persons or entities with a financial or other ownership interest may not enter into any management agreement under RCW 69.50.331(1)(b)(iv) or any agreement as referenced in RCW 69.50.395, whether or not in exchange for payment, that confers a financial interest across more than five retail cannabis licenses. For the purposes of this subsection, "financial interest" includes, but is not limited to:

(A) Any sharing of profits or revenue;

(B) Any assistance, coordination, or recommendation for the purchase of cannabis products whereupon pricing is coordinated or discounted;

(C) The common use of intellectual property assets such as branding, trade names, logos, social media accounts, or websites;

(D) Any operational control over the business or operational support for typical day-to-day business operations, including core business or executive functions of the retail cannabis license;

(E) Any sharing or coordination of marketing and advertising efforts or expenses; and

(F) Any coordinated sharing of employment or hiring decisions, including the shared employment of individuals.

(c)(i) A cannabis retailer's license is subject to forfeiture in accordance with rules adopted by the board pursuant to this section.

(A) No cannabis retailer's license may be subject to forfeiture within the first nine months of license issuance; and

(iii) The board has discretion in adopting rules under this subsection (3)(c).

(A) The adoption of a ban or moratorium that prohibits the opening of a retail cannabis business; or

(d) The board may issue cannabis retailer licenses pursuant to this chapter and RCW 69.50.335.

[ 2025 c 250 s 1; 2022 c 16 s 54; 2020 c 236 s 6; 2018 c 132 s 3. Prior: 2017 c 317 s 1; 2017 c 316 s 2; 2016 c 170 s 1; 2015 c 70 s 5; 2014 c 192 s 2; 2013 c 3 s 4 (Initiative Measure No. 502, approved November 6, 2012).]

Notes:

Application—2025 c 250: "This act applies:

(1) Retroactively to agreements entered before January 1, 2026; and

(2) Prospectively to agreements entered or renewed on or after January 1, 2026." [ 2025 c 250 s 2.]

Effective date—2025 c 250: "This act takes effect January 1, 2026." [ 2025 c 250 s 3.]

Intent—Finding—2022 c 16: See note following RCW 69.50.101.

Findings—Intent—2020 c 236: See note following RCW 69.50.335.

Effective date—2018 c 132 s 3: "Section 3 of this act takes effect July 1, 2018." [ 2018 c 132 s 4.]

Effective date—2017 c 316 ss 2 and 3: "Sections 2 and 3 of this act take effect July 1, 2018." [ 2017 c 316 s 4.]

Effective date—2016 c 170: "This act takes effect July 1, 2016." [ 2016 c 170 s 3.]

Short title—Findings—Intent—References to Washington state liquor control board—Draft legislation—2015 c 70: See notes following RCW 66.08.012.

Intent—2013 c 3 (Initiative Measure No. 502): See note following RCW 69.50.101.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 17 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2015–2026 · leading case: Emerald Enter. & John Larson v. Clark Cnty., 413 P.3d 92 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Emerald Enter. & John Larson v. Clark Cnty., 413 P.3d 92 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 4× “The licensing scheme creates the framework allowing select people to legally sell marijuana.”

Headspace Int'l, Llc v. Podworks Corp., 428 P.3d 1260 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 3× “RCW 69.50.325. To avoid conflicting with those federal interstate commerce laws and regulations prohibiting the possession and sale of marijuana products, licenses may not be issued to out-of-state companies or individuals.”

Raz Yaron, V. Sierra Conley, 488 P.3d 855 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 3× “018 pursuant to authority vested in it by RCW 69.50.325, 69.50.342, 69.50.345, and 69.”

Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of Kent, 351 P.3d 151 (Wash. 2015). “See RCW 69.50.325(1). This case concerns Washington’s medical marijuana system.”

In the Matter of the Petition of: Kittitas Cnty. for a Declaratory Order, 438 P.3d 1199 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 3× “RCW 69.50.325, .331. Under the law, marijuana producers, processors, and retailers must operate under Board-approved licenses.”

Arky Vandelay, LLC v. Washington State Liquor & Cannabis Bd. (Wash. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 10× “See RCW 69.50.325. No cannabis license could be subject to forfeiture within the first nine months of receiving a license.”

Libby Haines-marchel, Et Ano, App v. Wa State Liquor & Cannabis Bd., Resp (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 5× “2d at 382 ; see also RCW 69.50.325(3). Because Chronics LLC and Haines-Marchel do not have a property interest in the issuance of a marijuana license, the WSLCB did not violate due process by denying the application for a license.”

Does 1, 2, 4, 5, Appellants/cross-respondents V. Sam Sueoka, Respondents/cross-appellants (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “270(24) cannabis board per RCW 69.50.325, 9.50.331, 2015 c 178 s 2 Proprietary Information 42.”

Polk v. Gontmakher (W.D. Wash. 2019). · cites it 2× “RCW § 69.50.325. There are, of course, 17 restrictions to who can obtain these licenses.”

Peridot Tree WA Inc v. Washington State Liquor & Cannabis Control Bd. (W.D. Wash. 2024). · cites it 2× “For example, 22 Washington forbids licensees from operating outside of the state, RCW § 69.50.325, or 23 advertising cannabis across state lines, RCW § 69.”

John Worthington, App./cross-res. v. Wa State Liquor & Cannabis Bd., Res/cross-app. (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “3, § 1; RCW 69.50.325. The WSLCB began the process of developing those rules in December 2012 and adopted the first set of rules in November 2 No.”

State of Washington v. Cassie Kay Robertson (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “2304 MARIJUANA-PROCESSING-RETAIL LICENSES AN ACT Relating to marijuana processing and retail licenses; amending RCW 69.50.325, 69.50.354, 69.50.357, 69.50.”

Show all 17 citing cases →

— Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.325(1) — 2 cases

Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of Kent, 351 P.3d 151 (Wash. 2015). “See RCW 69.50.325(1). This case concerns Washington’s medical marijuana system.”

Raz Yaron, V. Sierra Conley, 488 P.3d 855 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “018 pursuant to authority vested in it by RCW 69.50.325, 69.50.342, 69.50.345, and 69.”

— Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.325(3) — 2 cases

Libby Haines-marchel, Et Ano, App v. Wa State Liquor & Cannabis Bd., Resp (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “2d at 382 ; see also RCW 69.50.325(3). Because Chronics LLC and Haines-Marchel do not have a property interest in the issuance of a marijuana license, the WSLCB did not violate due process by denying the application for a license.”

Valley Cities Counseling & Consultation, V. Ezra L. Eddines, 553 P.3d 693 (Wash. Ct. App. 2024).

— Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.325(3)(a) — 3 cases

Emerald Enter. & John Larson v. Clark Cnty., 413 P.3d 92 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “The licensing scheme creates the framework allowing select people to legally sell marijuana.”

Stacy Percival-birchard, -cross Resp v. Brian Caldwell, Respondent-cross App (Wash. Ct. App. 2021).

— Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.325(3)(c)(i)(v) — 1 case

Arky Vandelay, LLC v. Washington State Liquor & Cannabis Bd. (Wash. Ct. App. 2026). “See RCW 69.50.325. No cannabis license could be subject to forfeiture within the first nine months of receiving a license.”

— Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.325(3)(c)(ii)(A) — 1 case

— Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.325(3)(c)(ii)(B) — 2 cases

In the Matter of the Petition of: Kittitas Cnty. for a Declaratory Order, 438 P.3d 1199 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “RCW 69.50.325, .331. Under the law, marijuana producers, processors, and retailers must operate under Board-approved licenses.”

— Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.325(3)(c)(v) — 1 case

— Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.325(3)(c)(v)(B) — 1 case

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.

Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.325 (2026)

Notes:

RCW 69.50.325

Cannabis producer's license, cannabis processor's license, cannabis retailer's license. (Effective January 1, 2026.)

Notes: