Wash. Rev. Code » Title 9 · Chapter 9.02
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 9.02.110 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The state may not deny or interfere with a pregnant individual's right to choose to have an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or to protect the pregnant individual's life or health.
A physician, physician assistant, *advanced registered nurse practitioner, or other health care provider acting within the provider's scope of practice may terminate and a health care provider may assist a physician, physician assistant, *advanced registered nurse practitioner, or other health care provider acting within the provider's scope of practice in terminating a pregnancy as permitted by this section.
[ 2022 c 65 s 3; 1992 c 1 s 2 (Initiative Measure No. 120, approved November 5, 1991).]

Notes:

*Reviser's note: The term "advanced registered nurse practitioner" was changed to "advanced practice registered nurse" by 2024 c 239 s 1, effective June 30, 2027.
Legislative affirmation—2022 c 65: See note following RCW 9.02.100.
PDF

RCW 9.02.110

Right to have and provide. (Effective June 30, 2027.)

The state may not deny or interfere with a pregnant individual's right to choose to have an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or to protect the pregnant individual's life or health.
A physician, physician assistant, advanced practice registered nurse, or other health care provider acting within the provider's scope of practice may terminate and a health care provider may assist a physician, physician assistant, advanced practice registered nurse, or other health care provider acting within the provider's scope of practice in terminating a pregnancy as permitted by this section.
[ 2025 c 58 s 5061; 2022 c 65 s 3; 1992 c 1 s 2 (Initiative Measure No. 120, approved November 5, 1991).]

Notes:

Effective date—2025 c 58 ss 5058-5170: See note following RCW 7.68.030.
Explanatory note—2025 c 58: See note following RCW 1.16.050.
Legislative affirmation—2022 c 65: See note following RCW 9.02.100.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2024 · leading case: Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968 (1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968 (1997). · cites it 4× “1-2930 (1994); Wash. Rev. Code §§ 9.02.110 , 9.02.120, 9.”
Matsumoto v. Labrador, 122 F.4th 787 (9th Cir. 2024). “640(3); Wash. Rev. Code § 9.02.110 . The term “trafficking,” whether of humans or otherwise, is also usually defined with respect to an illegal trade with economic motive.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.