Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 103.04 (2026)
Labor and industry review commission
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
103.04(1)(1) The commission shall issue its decision in any case where a petition for review is filed under ch. 102 or 108 or s. 66.191, 1981 stats., or s. 40.65 (2), 106.52 (4), 106.56 (4), 111.39, 303.07 (7) or 303.21.
103.04(2)(2) Notwithstanding s. 227.11, the commission may not promulgate rules except that it may promulgate its rules of procedure.
103.04(3)(3) The commission may employ professional and other persons to assist in the execution of its duties.
103.04 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 29; 1981 c. 278 s. 6; 1981 c. 334 s. 25 (2); 1983 a. 122; 1983 a. 191 s. 6; 1985 a. 182 s. 57; 1987 a. 403 s. 256; 1989 a. 31; 1991 a. 295; 1995 a. 27 s. 3651; Stats. 1995 s. 103.04; 1999 a. 82.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1997–2011 · leading case: DaimlerChrysler v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 2007 WI 15 (Wis. 2007).
DaimlerChrysler v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 2007 WI 15 (Wis. 2007). “[5] Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 102.18 (2) [6] , the DWD maintains on its staff ALJs to hear and decide disputed claims.”
Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. State Div. of Hearings & Appeals, 2006 WI 86 (Wis. 2006). “11 provides for the general rule-making authority of administrative agencies.) Under Wis. Stat. § 227.43 (l)(d), "The administrator of the division of hearings and appeals in the department of administration shall.”
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 2000 WI App 272 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000). “§ 103.04. Consequently, as we have noted, owing to its authority and expertise in employment-related matters, our review of the commission's factual findings is highly deferential, requiring that we uphold a finding unless "a reasonable person, acting reasonably, could not have…”
Wisconsin Dep't of Workforce Dev. v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 2006 WI App 241 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). “See Wis. Stat. § 103.04 (1) and Wis. Stat. ch.”
Aldrich v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 2011 WI App 94 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011). “Best Buy contends that the Commission's interpretation of the WFEA is entitled to great weight deference, and the Commission agrees.”
Bammert v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 2000 WI App 28 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “Although Bammert does not dispute that LIRC was charged by the legislature with the duty of administering the WFEA, see §§ 103.04(1) and 111.39(5), Stats.; Currie, 210 Wis.”
Dwd v. Lirc, 2006 WI App 241 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). “§ 103.04(1) and WIS. STAT. ch. 108. Therefore, LIRC is authorized by § 2311(d) and by the agreement to review DWD's determinations on entitlement to benefits under the Act.”
Berry v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 570 N.W.2d 610 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997). “2 Several of the decisions deal with terminations involving early retirement or voluntary separation incentives. In each, the LIRC interpreted the statute to require a showing that a claimant's voluntary termination of employment was related to an identifiable, threatened…”
— Wis. Stat. § 103.04(1) — 2 cases
Bammert v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 2000 WI App 28 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “Although Bammert does not dispute that LIRC was charged by the legislature with the duty of administering the WFEA, see §§ 103.04(1) and 111.39(5), Stats.; Currie, 210 Wis.”
Dwd v. Lirc, 2006 WI App 241 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). “§ 103.04(1) and WIS. STAT. ch. 108. Therefore, LIRC is authorized by § 2311(d) and by the agreement to review DWD's determinations on entitlement to benefits under the Act.”
— Wis. Stat. § 103.04(2) — 1 case
Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. State Div. of Hearings & Appeals, 2006 WI 86 (Wis. 2006). “11 provides for the general rule-making authority of administrative agencies.) Under Wis. Stat. § 227.43 (l)(d), "The administrator of the division of hearings and appeals in the department of administration shall.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.