Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 66.0233 (2026)

Town participation in actions to test alterations of town boundaries

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

66.023366.0233 Town participation in actions to test alterations of town boundaries. In a proceeding in which territory may be attached to or detached from a town, the town is an interested party, and the town board may institute, maintain or defend an action brought to test the validity of the proceedings, and may intervene or be impleaded in the action.

66.0233 HistoryHistory: 1999 a. 150 s. 73; Stats. 1999 s. 66.0233.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2002–2016 · leading case: Vill. of Slinger v. City of Hartford, 2002 WI App 187 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Vill. of Slinger v. City of Hartford, 2002 WI App 187 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 3× “When the legislature created the annexation statute of Wis. Stat. § 66.0233 , 3 it chose only to establish a town's right to challenge an annexation ordinance, not to extend that same right to adjoining property owners.”

Darboy Jt. Sanitary Dist. No. 1 v. City of Kaukauna, 2013 WI App 113 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 7× “Next, the Town relies on Wis. Stat. § 66.0233 5 and Wis. Stat. § 60.”

Town of Burnside v. City of Indep., 2016 WI App 94 (Wis. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “See Wis. Stat. § 66.0233 . Arcadia also filed a proposed complaint, which purported to wholly incorporate the earlier Burnside/Lincoln complaint and challenged the annexation on generally the same bases as articulated in that document.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.