Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 757.22 (2026)

Judge not to act as attorney, etc.; attorneys not to have office with judge

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
757.22757.22Judge not to act as attorney, etc.; attorneys not to have office with judge.
757.22(1)(1)No judge, while holding office, may be in any manner engaged or act as attorney or counsel; and no judge or his or her clerk or any person employed by the judge in or about his or her office, court commissioner or other judicial officer shall be allowed to give advice to parties litigant in any matter or action pending before the judge or officer, or which the judge has reason to believe will be brought before him or her for decision, or draft or prepare any papers, including wills, or other proceedings relating to any such matter or action except when expressly authorized by law; and no court commissioner or other judicial officer may be allowed to demand or receive any fees or compensation for services as such commissioner or judicial officer, except those expressly authorized by law, upon penalty, for any violation hereof, of removal from office.
757.22(2)(2)No practicing attorney may hold office in the office of the clerk of any court in which he or she practices nor may he or she hold office in the same room with a judge.
757.22(3)(3)No practicing attorney may have his or her office in the same room with any district attorney, municipal judge or court commissioner, unless he or she is a partner of the district attorney, municipal judge or court commissioner, in which case he or she shall not practice as an attorney before the municipal judge or court commissioner nor act as attorney in any case in which it is the duty of the district attorney to appear or prosecute for the state; except that the law partner of any district attorney may, at the request of the district attorney, without fee or compensation therefor, assist the district attorney in the prosecution of any case on the part of the state.
757.22(4)(4)No law partner of any district attorney may act as a municipal judge or court commissioner in any case in which the state may be a party or defend in any court any person charged with any offense, or appear in any civil action against the state in which it is the duty of the district attorney to prosecute or appear for the state.
757.22(5)(5)Any attorney who violates sub. (2), (3) or (4), and any municipal judge or court commissioner who violates or knowingly permits any such violation, may be fined not to exceed $100 for each such offense.
757.22 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 187 s. 96; 1977 c. 305 ss. 52, 64; Stats. 1977 s. 757.22.
757.22 AnnotationUnder sub. (1), a judge may not draft or prepare legal papers even on a gratuitous basis. In re Van Susteren, 82 Wis. 2d 307, 262 N.W.2d 133 (1978).
757.22 AnnotationA probate registrar is an official of the court. An attorney who serves as probate registrar is prohibited from practicing law in the court. 63 Atty. Gen. 55.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2025 · leading case: D.S. v. Racine Cnty., 416 N.W.2d 292 (Wis. 1987).
D.S. v. Racine Cnty., 416 N.W.2d 292 (Wis. 1987). · cites it 3× “” It was alleged at oral argument that the person selected for the position of probate coordinator is chosen by the Racine County Personnel Office and the circuit judge to whose court that person is assigned does not participate in or ratify this process of employment.”
State Ex Rel. Stedman v. Rohner, 438 N.W.2d 585 (Wis. 1989). · cites it 3× “, prohibits court commissioners from giving advice to parties litigant in any matter or action pending before the court commissioner and prohibits the court commissioner from drafting any papers or taking part in proceedings related to any matter pending before the commissioner…”
In Matter of DS, 416 N.W.2d 292 (Wis. 1987). · cites it 3× “" It was alleged at oral argument that the person selected for the position of probate coordinator is chosen by the Racine County Personnel Office and the circuit judge to whose court that person is assigned does not participate in or ratify this process of employment.”
Jessica Mabin v. Talgat Konkargaev (Wis. Ct. App. 2025). “§ 757.22 (2023-24), which prohibits a judge from acting as an attorney or counsel.”
— Wis. Stat. § 757.22(1) — 2 cases
D.S. v. Racine Cnty., 416 N.W.2d 292 (Wis. 1987). “” It was alleged at oral argument that the person selected for the position of probate coordinator is chosen by the Racine County Personnel Office and the circuit judge to whose court that person is assigned does not participate in or ratify this process of employment.”
In Matter of DS, 416 N.W.2d 292 (Wis. 1987). “" It was alleged at oral argument that the person selected for the position of probate coordinator is chosen by the Racine County Personnel Office and the circuit judge to whose court that person is assigned does not participate in or ratify this process of employment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.