Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 788.12 (2026)

Judgment

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

788.12788.12 Judgment. Upon the granting of an order confirming, modifying or correcting an award, judgment may be entered in conformity therewith in the court wherein the order was granted.

788.12 HistoryHistory: 1979 c. 32 s. 64; Stats. 1979 s. 788.12.

788.12 AnnotationThere is no statutory authority for awarding costs to a party in an arbitration proceeding. Finkenbinder v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co., 215 Wis. 2d 145, 572 N.W.2d 501 (Ct. App. 1997), 97-0357.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: Midwest Neurosciences Assocs., LLC v. Great Lakes Neurosurgical Assocs., LLC, 920 N.W.2d 767 (Wis. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Midwest Neurosciences Assocs., LLC v. Great Lakes Neurosurgical Assocs., LLC, 920 N.W.2d 767 (Wis. 2018). · cites it 2× “¶50 Thus, when parties have contracted for arbitration as the forum for dispute resolution, a court's role is limited. In this case, however, the court must first ascertain whether the controlling contract *699 calls for arbitration.”

Paul Davis Restoration of S.E. Wisconsin, Inc. v. Paul Davis Restoration of Ne. Wisconsin, 2013 WI 49 (Wis. 2013). · cites it 4× “" Wis. Stat. § 788.12 . III. DISCUSSION 10 No.”

Leavitt v. Beverly Enter., Inc., 2010 WI 71 (Wis. 2010). · cites it 4× “Wis. Stat. § 788.12 . Thus, the parties still have the opportunity to have their day in court, if necessary, after arbitration is complete.”

Midwest Neurosciences Assocs., LLC v. Great Lakes Neurosurgical Assocs., LLC (Wis. 2018). · cites it 2× “Finally, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 788.12 , a circuit court may enter judgment "[u]pon the granting of an order confirming, modifying or correcting an award," in conformity therewith.”

Herbal Aspect LLC v. Alexander Gish (Wis. Ct. App. 2026). “§ 788.12 (An appeal may be taken from an order confirming, modifying, correcting or vacating an award, or from a judgment entered upon an award, as from an order or judgment in an action.”

Ciszewski v. Milas, 871 F. Supp. 1065 (E.D. Wis. 1994). · cites it 2× “§ 1983 if the state court confirms the arbitrator’s award and the defendants comply with the award by reinstating him.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.