Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 806.03 (2026)

Judgment on admitted claim; order to satisfy

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
806.03806.03Judgment on admitted claim; order to satisfy. In an action on an express contract for the recovery of a liquidated sum of money only, if the answer admits any part of the plaintiff’s claim or if the answer sets up a counterclaim for an amount less than the plaintiff’s claim and contains no other defense to the action, the clerk, on motion of the plaintiff, shall render and enter judgment for the amount so admitted or for the amount claimed in the complaint less the amount of the defendant’s counterclaim. When the defendant admits part of the plaintiff’s claim to be just, the court, on motion, may order the defendant to satisfy that part of the claim and may enforce the order as it enforces a judgment or provisional remedy.
806.03 HistoryHistory: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 718 (1975); Sup. Ct. Order, 73 Wis. 2d xxxi (1976).
806.03 NoteJudicial Council Committee’s Note, 1976: A clerk of court is permitted under s. 806.06 (2) to render the judgment described in ss. 806.02 (4) and 806.03. [Re Order effective Jan. 1, 1977]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1995 · leading case: Stan's Lumber, Inc. v. Fleming, 538 N.W.2d 849 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995).
Stan's Lumber, Inc. v. Fleming, 538 N.W.2d 849 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 6× “The court then entered judgment in this admitted amount pursuant to § 806.03, Stats. 3 Thereafter, on March 28,1994, Stan's filed an offer of settlement in the amount of $30,000.”
E.C. Styberg Eng'g Co. v. Consum. Steel & Supply Co., 347 N.W.2d 167 (Wis. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 9× “from an order of the trial court which (1) denied reconsideration of Sty-berg’s previous motion for summary judgment and (2) granted judgment to Styberg only on that portion of the claim admitted by defendant Consumer Steel & Supply Company pursuant to sec. 806.03, Stats.…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.