Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 10-2B-1.01 (2026)

Short Title and Applicability.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

All provisions of Title 10 have been repealed or transferred to Title 10A, effective January 1, 2011.

(Acts 1994, No. 94-245, p. 343, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2001–2010 · leading case: Offenbecher v. Baron Servs., Inc., 874 So. 2d 532 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002).
Offenbecher v. Baron Servs., Inc., 874 So. 2d 532 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “The Alabama Business Corporation Act, § 10-2B-1.01 et seq., Ala.Code 1975, which became effective in March 1994, is modeled after the American Bar Association's Revised Model Business Corporation Act.”
Gilbert v. James Russell Motors, Inc., 812 So. 2d 1269 (Ala. Civ. App. 2001). “The evidence indicates without dispute that G & W was operated in accordance with its stated purpose, that of buying and selling used automobiles. In addition, the record contains evidence indicating that G & W was formed and registered in compliance with the provisions of the…”
Attorneys Ins. Mut. of Alabama, Inc. v. Alabama Dep't of Ins., 64 So. 3d 1 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010). “We reject AIM's arguments based on the purported applicability of the Alabama Business Corporation Act ("the Act”), § 10-2B-1.01 et seq., Ala.Code 1975 (now amended and renumbered by Act No.”
Baldwin Cnty. Elec. Membership Corp. v. Lee, 804 So. 2d 1087 (Ala. 2001). “…Act] is inconsistent with [Ala.Code 1975, § 37-6-1 et seq. ] specifically applicable to [electrical cooperatives]." Section 10-2B-1.01(b).”
Attorneys Ins. Mut. v. Dept. of Ins., 64 So. 3d 1 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “) [10] We reject AIM's arguments based on the purported applicability of the Alabama Business Corporation Act ("the Act"), § 10-2B-1.01 et seq., Ala.Code 1975 (now amended and renumbered by Act No.”
Ala. Code § 10-2B-1.01(b): 2 cases
Baldwin Cnty. Elec. Membership Corp. v. Lee, 804 So. 2d 1087 (Ala. 2001). “…Act] is inconsistent with [Ala.Code 1975, § 37-6-1 et seq. ] specifically applicable to [electrical cooperatives]." Section 10-2B-1.01(b).”
Attorneys Ins. Mut. v. Dept. of Ins., 64 So. 3d 1 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010). “) [10] We reject AIM's arguments based on the purported applicability of the Alabama Business Corporation Act ("the Act"), § 10-2B-1.01 et seq., Ala.Code 1975 (now amended and renumbered by Act No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.