Code of Alabama
Ala. Code § 10-8-43 (2026)
(Repealed Effective January 1, 2001) Rights and Duties of Partners.
✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Repealed by Acts 1996, No. 96-528, p. 685, §1, effective January 1, 2001.
(Acts 1971, No. 1513, p. 2609, §18.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1978–1995 · leading case: Vance v. Huff, 568 So. 2d 745 (Ala. 1990).
Vance v. Huff, 568 So. 2d 745 (Ala. 1990). “Under Ala. Code 1975, § 10-8-43(6), "no partner is entitled to remuneration for acting in the partnership business.”
Head v. Henry Tyler Const. Corp., 539 So. 2d 196 (Ala. 1988). “Ala. Code 1975, § 10-8-43. In conclusion, we agree with the trial court that appellants' reliance on Brown v.”
Adderhold v. Adderhold, 426 So. 2d 457 (Ala. Civ. App. 1983). “See Ala. Code § 10-8-43 (1975). Certainly, the "surrounding circumstances" indicate a partnership.”
Nash v. Vann, 390 So. 2d 301 (Ala. Civ. App. 1980). “Although, generally, a partner is not entitled to any compensation for services rendered by him to the partnership, the partners may agree that a partner shall receive compensation, or such an agreement may be implied.”
Burgess Min. & Const. Corp. v. Lees, 440 So. 2d 321 (Ala. 1983). “" See § 10-8-43 (1). The argument by Lees is that irrespective of the leases the equipment was in essence purchased with partnership funds, thereby making the equipment partnership property.”
Mims, Lyemance, & Reich v. UAB Rsch. Found., 620 So. 2d 594 (Ala. 1993). “Finally, MLR contends that the court erred in denying its claim under the theory of quantum meruit for 1) a recovery to compensate it for expenses it incurred and 2) the value of services rendered during the evaluation of the feasibility of the project.”
Vergos v. Waterman Bldg. P'ship, 613 So. 2d 383 (Ala. 1993). “” The trial court found that the evidence was undisputed that all of the partners consented to the admission of Vergos as a member of the Partnership.”
Thomas v. Vaughn, 915 F. Supp. 1177 (M.D. Ala. 1995). “Ala.Code 1975, § 10-8-43(7) (emphasis added).”
Papan v. Papan, 362 So. 2d 902 (Ala. 1978). “l975, § 10-8-43(6)) mandates that “. . .a surviving partner is entitled to reasonable compensation for his services in winding up the partnership affairs.”
— Ala. Code § 10-8-43(6) — 3 cases
Vance v. Huff, 568 So. 2d 745 (Ala. 1990). “Under Ala. Code 1975, § 10-8-43(6), "no partner is entitled to remuneration for acting in the partnership business.”
Mims, Lyemance, & Reich v. UAB Rsch. Found., 620 So. 2d 594 (Ala. 1993). “Finally, MLR contends that the court erred in denying its claim under the theory of quantum meruit for 1) a recovery to compensate it for expenses it incurred and 2) the value of services rendered during the evaluation of the feasibility of the project.”
Papan v. Papan, 362 So. 2d 902 (Ala. 1978). “l975, § 10-8-43(6)) mandates that “. . .a surviving partner is entitled to reasonable compensation for his services in winding up the partnership affairs.”
— Ala. Code § 10-8-43(7) — 1 case
Thomas v. Vaughn, 915 F. Supp. 1177 (M.D. Ala. 1995). “Ala.Code 1975, § 10-8-43(7) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.