When any case is submitted to the Supreme Court which should have gone to one of the courts of appeals or is submitted to one court of appeals when it should have gone to the other, it must not be dismissed but shall be transferred to the proper court; and, when any case is submitted to a court of appeals which should have gone to the Supreme Court, it shall be transferred to the Supreme Court.
(Acts 1969, No. 987, p. 1744, §11.)
Notes of Decisions
Thompson v. Bd. of Pardons & Paroles, 806 So. 2d 374 (Ala. 2001).
· cites it 2× “Pursuant to § 12-1-4, Ala.Code 1975, the Court of Criminal Appeals transferred the case to the Court of Civil Appeals.”
Ruiz v. Nat'l Dairy, LLC, 164 So. 3d 602 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014).
· cites it 2× “See Ala.Code 1975, § 12-1-4 (“[Wjhen any case is submitted to a court of appeals which should have gone to the Supreme Court, it shall be transferred to the Supreme Court.”
R.B.Z. v. Warwick Dev. Co., 725 So. 2d 257 (Ala. 1997).
· cites it 2× “” If on a notice of appeal an appellant erroneously designates the court to which the appeal is taken, the appellate court to which the appeal is taken “shall” transfer the case to the proper court: “When any case is submitted to the Supreme Court which should have gone to one…”
Khalidi v. Weeks Fam. P'ship, 912 So. 2d 256 (Ala. Civ. App. 2005).
“Following a hearing, the trial court, without stating its rationale, denied Khali-di’s summary-judgment motion, granted Weeks’s summary-judgment motion, and entered a summary judgment in favor of Weeks.”
Batey v. Dare, 742 So. 2d 194 (Ala. Civ. App. 1999).
“Accordingly, we transfer this case to the Court of Criminal Appeals, pursuant to § 12-1-4, Ala.Code 1975. APPEAL TRANSFERRED.”
Ex Parte RBZ, 725 So. 2d 257 (Ala. 1997).
· cites it 2× “" If on a notice of appeal an appellant erroneously designates the court to which the appeal is taken, the appellate court to which the appeal is taken "shall" transfer the case to the proper court: "When any case is submitted to the Supreme Court which should have gone to one…”
Smith v. Houston, 71 So. 3d 721 (Ala. Crim. App. 2010).
· cites it 2× “The Court of Civil Appeals then transferred the appeal to the Supreme Court, which stated: “The Court of Civil Appeals recognized that it did not have jurisdiction over the case, because it concerned a matter not expressly assigned to that court by § 12-3-10, Ala.”
1 Quick Bail Bonds, LLC v. State, 262 So. 3d 1222 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017).
“Because the amount involved exceeds $50,000, we transferred 1 Quick's appeal to the supreme court, pursuant to § 12-1-4, Ala. Code 1975. The supreme court then transferred 1 Quick's appeal to this court, pursuant to § 12-2-7(6), Ala.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.