Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 15-12-23 (2026)

Appointment and Compensation of Counsel - Post-Conviction Proceedings.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In proceedings filed in the district or circuit court involving the life and liberty of those charged with or convicted of serious criminal offenses including proceedings for habeas corpus or other post-conviction remedies, the trial or presiding judge or chief justice of the court in which the proceedings may be commenced or pending may appoint counsel through an indigent defense system approved by the office to represent and assist indigent defendants if it appears to the court that the indigent defendant is unable financially or otherwise to obtain the assistance of counsel and desires the assistance of counsel and it further appears that counsel is necessary in the opinion of the judge to assert or protect the right of the indigent defendant.

(b) In proceedings filed in the district or circuit court involving the life and liberty of those persons charged or adjudicated for juvenile offenses including proceedings for habeas corpus or other post-conviction remedies, and in post-trial motions or appeals in the proceedings, the trial or presiding judge or chief justice of the court in which the proceedings may be commenced or pending may appoint counsel through the indigent defense system for such cases to represent and assist those persons so charged or adjudicated if it appears to the court that the person charged or adjudicated is unable financially or otherwise to obtain the assistance of counsel and it further appears that counsel is necessary in the opinion of the judge to assert or protect the rights of the person, or court appointed counsel is otherwise required by law or rule of court.

(c) It shall be the duty of the counsel as provided in subsections (a) and (b) as an officer of the court and a member of the bar to represent and assist the indigent defendant in the proceedings.

(d) Any appointed counsel shall be entitled to receive for his or her services a fee to be approved by the office. The amount of the fee shall be based on the number of hours spent by counsel in working on the proceedings. The fee shall be computed at the rate of seventy dollars ($70) per hour for time reasonably expended on the proceedings. The total fees to counsel for the proceedings shall not exceed one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the maximum amount may be waived by the director for good cause shown. Counsel shall also be entitled to be reimbursed for any nonoverhead expenses reasonably incurred in the representation of his or her client, with any expense in excess of three hundred dollars ($300) subject to advance approval by the court as necessary for the indigent defense services and as a reasonable cost or expense. Reimbursable expenses shall not include overhead expenses. Fees and expenses of all experts, investigators, and others rendering indigent defense services to be used by counsel for an indigent defendant shall be approved in advance by the court as necessary for the indigent defense services and as a reasonable cost or expense. Retrials of any case shall be considered a new case for billing purposes. Upon review, the director may authorize interim payment of the attorney fees or expenses, or both.

(e) Claim for the fee shall be submitted, approved, and paid in the same manner as provided in subdivision (3) of Section 15-12-22.

(Acts 1963, No. 526, p. 1136, §7; Acts 1971, No. 2420, p. 3851; Acts 1981, No. 81-717, p. 1204, §4; Act 99-427, p. 759, §1; Act 2011-678, p. 1862, §6.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1979–2018 · leading case: Gibson v. Turpin, 513 S.E.2d 186 (Ga. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Gibson v. Turpin, 513 S.E.2d 186 (Ga. 1999). · cites it 2× “See Ala. Code § 15-12-23 (a) (1995) (subject to judicial discretion); Ariz.”

Sparks v. Parker, 368 So. 2d 528 (Ala. 1979). · cites it 2× “In essence, appellants are challenging the orders establishing the indigent defense system in Calhoun County, seeking to have this *530 Court determine that § 15-12-21 through § 15-12-23, Code of 1975, are unconstitutional.”

O.P. Hollis v. J.O. Davis & the Attorney Gen. of the State of Alabama, Court of Appeals, Bullock Cnty., Crim. Courts, Union Springs, 941 F.2d 1471 (11th Cir. 1991). “Since 1963, Alabama has had a statute providing for the appointment of compensated counsel on post-conviction remedies, including habeas corpus and coram nobis, "if necessary to assert or protect the right of the person” incarcerated.”

Johnny Harris v. Harry J. Wilters, Jr., Individually & as Circuit Judge of the Twenty-Eighth Jud. Circuit, Baldwin Cnty., Alabama, 596 F.2d 678 (8th Cir. 1979). “Ala.Code § 15-12-23 (1975), the statute under which appellant’s attorneys were appointed, makes no provision for payment of expenses beyond an hourly attorney’s fee and sets a $300 limit thereon.”

O.P. Hollis v. J.O. Davis & the Attorney Gen. of the State of Alabama, Court of Appeals, Bullock Cnty., Crim. Courts, Union Springs, 912 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir. 1990). “Since 1963, Alabama has had a statute providing for the appointment of compensated counsel on post-conviction remedies, including habeas corpus and coram nobis, "if necessary to assert or protect the right of the person" incarcerated.”

Lucy v. State Of Alabama (S.D. Ala. 2018). · cites it 2× “5(a) (“All persons proceeding pro se shall be bound by, and must comply with, all Local Rules of this Court, as well as the Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure, unless excused by Court order.”). Additionally, this motion is properly DENIED for the reasons set out below.”

— Ala. Code § 15-12-23(a) — 1 case

Gibson v. Turpin, 513 S.E.2d 186 (Ga. 1999). “See Ala. Code § 15-12-23 (a) (1995) (subject to judicial discretion); Ariz.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.