Code of Alabama
Ala. Code § 16-24B-1 (2026)
Short Title.
✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Teacher Accountability Act.”
(Act 2000-733, p. 1588, §1.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2006–2025 · leading case: Emily Walker v. Montgomery Cnty. Bd. of Educ.., 85 So. 3d 1008 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011).
Emily Walker v. Montgomery Cnty. Bd. of Educ.., 85 So. 3d 1008 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). “Based on the terms of her contract and the Teacher Accountability Act (“the TAA”), Ala.Code 1975, § 16-24B-1 et seq., Walker was employed as a contract principal 1 for a three-year term.”
Bd. of Sch. Commissioners v. Christopher, 97 So. 3d 163 (Ala. Crim. App. 2012). “Code 1975, there are no established criteria set forth in the FDA for determining which of a board’s employees should be terminated when a RIF policy must be implemented. See Williams, supra; and Walker, supra.”
Curry v. Russell Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 125 So. 3d 711 (Ala. Civ. App. 2013). “Bonnie Curry appeals from an adverse judgment entered by the Russell Circuit Court (“the trial court”) following a hearing held by the trial court pursuant to the Teacher Accountability Act, § 16-24B-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975. We affirm.”
Yance v. Dothan City Bd. of Educ., 163 So. 3d 1070 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014). “Code 1975, § 16-24B-3(i)(1), a part of the Teacher Accountability Act (“the Act”), § 16-24B-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975. Furthermore, the contract provided, in accordance with Ala.”
Holmes v. Macon Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 11 So. 3d 205 (Ala. Civ. App. 2006). “Code 1975, states in its entirety that “[t]he chief executive officer, or his or her designee, shall at least annually evaluate the performance of each contract principal.”
Colbert Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Melcha Satchel (Appeal from Colbert Circuit Court: CV-24-23). (Ala. Civ. App. 2025). “To perfect an appeal from a judgment of a circuit court arising out of the Alabama Teacher Accountability Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 16-24B-1 et seq., a party must file a written notice of appeal with the clerk of this court within 14 days of the final judgment of the circuit court.”
Walker Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Guin (In re Guin), 267 So. 3d 335 (Ala. Civ. App. 2018). “*336 This mandamus petition arises from proceedings initiated by Tanya Guin seeking review of a decision of the Walker County Board of Education ("the Board") canceling Guin's employment as a contract principal under Alabama's Teacher Accountability Act ("the TAA"), Ala. Code…”
Walker Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Guin (In re Guin), 267 So. 3d 335 (Ala. Civ. App. 2018). “*336 This mandamus petition arises from proceedings initiated by Tanya Guin seeking review of a decision of the Walker County Board of Education ("the Board") canceling Guin's employment as a contract principal under Alabama's Teacher Accountability Act ("the TAA"), Ala. Code…”
Carl Michael Seibert v. Lorri Ann Fields (Ala. Civ. App. 2023). “Code 1975, § 16-24B-1 et seq., to be filed with the clerk of this court).”
Ronald Dean Pinson v. Chilton Cnty. Bd. of Educ. (Appeal from Chilton Circuit Court: CV-24-900003). (Ala. Civ. App. 2025). “Code 1975, a section of the Teacher Accountability Act ("the Act"), §16-24B-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975. Pursuant to the Act, on January 5, 2024, the board filed a request in the circuit court for an expedited nonjury evidentiary hearing, reminding the circuit court that such…”
Holmes v. Macon Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 11 So. 3d 205 (Ala. Civ. App. 2006). “Code 1975, states in its entirety that "[t]he chief executive officer, or his or her designee, shall at least annually evaluate the performance of each contract principal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.