Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 16-8-37 (2026)

Annual Report Published.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The county board of education shall publish annually in the month of October in the county newspaper at the county seat of each county a full and complete statement of the receipts by source and disbursements by function of the county for the 12 months’ period ending September 30 in such form as is required by the State Superintendent of Education at the same time it forwards said statement to the State Superintendent of Education. The county board of education shall also publish annually in the county newspaper at the county seat of each county in the month of October, a statement of the outstanding indebtedness of the board of education on September 30, which statement must show the schedule by years for retiring said indebtedness and shall separate funded indebtedness from unfunded indebtedness, and the statement shall show the resources available to pay such unfunded indebtedness. The county board of education may also cause to be prepared and published annually in sufficient quantities for distribution among the citizens of the county a report covering the condition, current accomplishments and needs for the improvement of the schools. The refusal or negligent failure of any member of the county board of education to comply with the provisions of this section shall constitute a misdemeanor, and the State Superintendent of Education shall withhold the payment of public school funds until the provisions of this section have been complied with.

(School Code 1927, §123; Code 1940, T. 52, §92; Acts 1943, No. 313, p. 300; Acts 1953, No. 130, p. 178, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1978–1978 · leading case: Phillips v. Beasley, 78 F.R.D. 207 (N.D. Ala. 1978).
Phillips v. Beasley, 78 F.R.D. 207 (N.D. Ala. 1978). “§§ 16-8-37, 16-11-24. . Transfers of students from one system to the other are limited, each system having been the subject of court-ordered desegregation plans which generally preclude such *213 transfers.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.