Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 22-25-16 (2026)

Reimbursement by New Employer for Training Expenses.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In those instances in which a water or wastewater operator of any municipality, municipal utility board, county, or the state is employed by the State of Alabama, any county, municipality, or another municipal utility board, within 24 months after completing the certification requirements mandated by this chapter, the total expense paid by the water or wastewater operator’s governmental employer to enable the operator to become certified, including, but not limited to, salary paid during training, transportation costs paid to the trainee for travel to and from the training facility, room, board, tuition, overtime paid to other employees who fill in for the trainee during his or her absence, and any other related training expenses, shall be reimbursed to the municipality, municipal utility board, county, or the state which paid for the training. The municipality, municipal utility board, county, or the state which paid for the training shall submit an itemized sworn statement to the new employer of the water or wastewater operator, as the case may be, shall demand payment thereof, and may enforce collection of the obligation through civil remedies and procedures. The terms “water operator” and “wastewater operator” shall have the same meanings as in Section 22-25-1.

(Acts 1996, No. 96-626, p. 997, §3; Act 2002-424, p. 1090, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: Water & Wastewater Bd. v. City of Athens, 17 So. 3d 241 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009).
Water & Wastewater Bd. v. City of Athens, 17 So. 3d 241 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009). · cites it 48× “The City notified the Board by letter in March 2004 that it claimed an entitlement to reimbursement under Ala.Code 1975, § 22-25-16, which permits the State, a municipality, a municipal utility board, or a county to seek reimbursement for the total amount that that entity…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.