Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 23-1-81 (2026)

County Commissions - Authority to Establish, Operate, Etc., Bridges, Ferries, Causeways, Etc.; Licensing.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The county commission of each county is invested with authority to purchase or establish toll bridges, free bridges, causeways, and ferries or free ferries within their respective jurisdictions as provided in this article and may levy a special tax to purchase or build the bridges and causeways when, in the opinion of the county commission, the public good requires it.

(b) The county commission of each county may also license any individual, group of individuals, partnership, corporation, association, or any other legal entity to establish or to operate toll roads, toll bridges, ferries, or causeways and authorize the licensee to establish and fix the rates of toll. Toll roads and toll bridges that are licensed by a county and which are on or over the line between any two counties shall be licensed by both counties.

(c) The State Department of Transportation may license any individual, groups of individuals, partnership, corporation, association, or any other legal entity to establish or operate toll roads, toll bridges, ferries, or causeways and authorize the licensee to establish and fix the rates of toll.

(d) After a license is issued pursuant to subsection (b) or (c) by a county commission or the State Department of Transportation, no further license of any type from any governmental body or agency, including, but not limited to, a business license, shall be required to construct, own, or operate the toll road or the toll bridge, ferry, or causeway and no further license, tax, or fee may be imposed by any governmental body or agency.

(e) No toll bridge shall be established over the same watercourse within two miles of any other toll bridge.

(f) Nothing contained in this section shall be deemed to limit the authority of the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources to grant easements and licenses with respect to the placement of bridges on state land.

(Code 1852, §1189; Code 1867, §1381; Code 1876, §1678; Code 1886, §1442; Code 1896, §2498; Code 1907, §3023; Code 1923, §6442; Code 1940, T. 23, §45; Acts 1996, 1st Ex. Sess., No. 96-30, p. 40, §1; Act 2000-216, p. 324, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2002–2003 · leading case: Ex Parte Emerald Mountain Expressway Bridge, 856 So. 2d 834 (Ala. 2003).
Ex Parte Emerald Mountain Expressway Bridge, 856 So. 2d 834 (Ala. 2003). · cites it 36× “The taxpayers are licensed to operate the toll bridges pursuant to § 23-1-81, Ala.Code 1975, which authorizes the county commission of each county in the State or the Alabama Department of Transportation to issue licenses to private individuals or entities to operate toll…”
Patterson v. Emerald Mountain Exp. Bridge, 856 So. 2d 826 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002). · cites it 39× “The taxpayers are licensed to operate the toll bridges pursuant to § 23-1-81, Ala.Code 1975. The dispute is whether § 23-1-81(d) provides the taxpayers an exemption from ad valorem taxation.”
Ala. Code § 23-1-81(c): 1 case
Patterson v. Emerald Mountain Exp. Bridge, 856 So. 2d 826 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002). “The taxpayers are licensed to operate the toll bridges pursuant to § 23-1-81, Ala.Code 1975. The dispute is whether § 23-1-81(d) provides the taxpayers an exemption from ad valorem taxation.”
Ala. Code § 23-1-81(d): 2 cases
Ex Parte Emerald Mountain Expressway Bridge, 856 So. 2d 834 (Ala. 2003). “The taxpayers are licensed to operate the toll bridges pursuant to § 23-1-81, Ala.Code 1975, which authorizes the county commission of each county in the State or the Alabama Department of Transportation to issue licenses to private individuals or entities to operate toll…”
Patterson v. Emerald Mountain Exp. Bridge, 856 So. 2d 826 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002). “The taxpayers are licensed to operate the toll bridges pursuant to § 23-1-81, Ala.Code 1975. The dispute is whether § 23-1-81(d) provides the taxpayers an exemption from ad valorem taxation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.