In death cases, where the death results proximately from the accident within three years, compensation payable to dependents shall be computed on the following basis and shall be paid to the persons entitled thereto without administration, or to a guardian or other person as the court may direct, for the use and benefit of the person entitled thereto.
(1) PERSONS ENTITLED TO BENEFITS; AMOUNT OF BENEFITS.
a. If the deceased employee leaves one dependent, there shall be paid to the dependent 50 percent of the average weekly earnings of the deceased.
b. If the deceased employee leaves two or more dependents, there shall be paid to the dependents 66 2/3 percent of the average weekly earnings of the deceased.
c. If one of two or more dependents is a widow or widower, the compensation may be paid to the widow or widower for the benefit of herself or himself and the dependent child or children. In its discretion and when it considers appropriate to do so, the court shall at any time have the power to determine, without the appointment of any guardian or guardians, what portion of the compensation shall be applied for the benefit of any child or children and may order the same paid to a guardian or custodian of the child or children.
d. Partial dependents shall be entitled to receive only that proportion of the benefits provided for total dependents which the average amount of the earnings regularly contributed by the deceased employee to the partial dependent, at and for a reasonable time immediately prior to the injury, bore to the total income of the dependent during the same time. If there is one dependent and one or more partial dependents and the dependent is not entitled to the maximum amount of compensation provided in Section 25-5-68, there shall be paid to the partial dependent or partial dependents that percentage of the benefit paid to a full dependent which the contribution of the decedent to the partial dependent’s support bears to the total income of the partial dependent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the compensation payable to the partial dependent or dependents shall not exceed the lesser of 16 2/3 percent of the decedent’s average weekly wage or the difference between the compensation payable to the full dependent and the maximum weekly compensation benefit payable as provided in Section 25-5-68.
e. Except as provided in paragraph h., if compensation is being paid under this article to any dependent, the compensation shall cease upon the death or marriage of the dependent, unless otherwise provided in this article.
f. Upon the cessation of compensation to or for any dependent, for any cause, the compensation of the remaining dependents entitled to compensation shall, for the unexpired period during which their compensation is payable, be that which would have been payable to them had they been the only persons entitled to compensation at the time of death of the deceased employee.
g. If, however, the deceased employee at the time of his or her death has no dependents as herein defined, then within 60 days of his or her death, the employer shall pay a one-time lump sum payment of seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) to the deceased worker’s estate.
h. If a dependent is the surviving spouse of a law enforcement officer or firefighter who dies on or after January 1, 2018, as a result of injuries received while engaged in the performance of his or her duties, the compensation does not cease upon remarriage.
(2) MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM COMPENSATION AWARDS. The compensation payable in case of death to persons wholly dependent shall be subject to a maximum and minimum weekly compensation as stated in Section 25-5-68, but if at the time of injury the employee receives earnings of less than the minimum stated in Section 25-5-68, then the compensation shall be the full amount of such earnings per week. The compensation payable to partial dependents shall be subject to a maximum and minimum weekly compensation as stated in Section 25-5-68, but if the income loss of the partial dependents by the death is less than the minimum weekly compensation stated in Section 25-5-68, then the dependents shall receive the full amount of their income loss. This compensation shall be paid during dependency, not exceeding 500 weeks, except as provided in subsection (f) of Section 25-5-68. Payments shall be made at the intervals when the earnings were payable, as nearly as may be, unless the parties otherwise agree.
(Acts 1919, No. 245, p. 206; Code 1923, §§7554, 7556, 7558; Acts 1935, No. 387, p. 831; Acts 1936, Ex. Sess., No. 29, p. 9; Code 1940, T. 26, §283; Acts 1949, No. 36, p. 47, §5; Acts 1949, No. 544, p. 855; Acts 1951, No. 563, p. 978; Acts 1955, No. 356, p. 864; Acts 1957, No. 338, p. 446; Acts 1967, No. 168, p. 509; Acts 1973, No. 1062, p. 1750, §16; Acts 1992, No. 92-537, p. 1082, §19;Act 2018-523, §2; Act 2019-445, §1.)
Notes of Decisions
Guy v. Sw. Ala. Council on Alcoholism, 475 So. 2d 1190 (Ala. Civ. App. 1985).
· cites it 8× “The employer filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that recovery was barred by Ala. Code (1975), § 25-5-60. That statute states, in pertinent part: "In death cases, where the death results proximately from the accident within three years, compensation payable to dependents shall…”
Chatham Steel Corp. v. Shadinger, 768 So. 2d 969 (Ala. Civ. App. 1999).
· cites it 17× “The maximum amount of benefits allowed in cases in which the worker dies from a work-related injury is set forth in § 25-5-60, Ala.Code 1975. In other words, if a worker is entitled to receive workers' compensation disability benefits, but dies of an unrelated cause, his…”
Kilgore v. Alabama By-Prods. Corp., 581 So. 2d 872 (Ala. Civ. App. 1991).
· cites it 12× “The employer moved for judgment on the pleadings or for summary judgment, on the basis that Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-60 and § 25-5-80, require that the death of the injured employee must occur within three years after the injury in order to receive compensation.”
Drummond Co., Inc. v. Lolley, 786 So. 2d 509 (Ala. Civ. App. 2000).
· cites it 16× “See Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-60. In its answer to the widow's petition, the company pleaded the "statute of limitations" as a defense to her claim.”
Taliaferro v. Goff Grp., 947 So. 2d 1073 (Ala. Civ. App. 2006).
· cites it 5× “The present case involves death benefits payable to dependents under the Workers' Compensation Act.”
Blansit v. Cornelius & Rush Coal Co., 380 So. 2d 854 (Ala. Civ. App. 1979).
· cites it 13× “In fact, I can find no material change in what is now codified as § 25-5-60 through § 25-5-68 since 1923. There has been a rearranging of the sections from the Code of 1940 and the Code recompiled in 1958 into the Code of 1975.”
Ex parte Thompson Tractor Co., 227 So. 3d 1234 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “See Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-60. While those motions were pending, the employer filed a motion to dismiss the workers’ compensation action, ■ arguing, among other theories, that'the trial court had lost subject-matter jurisdiction upon the death of the employee.”
Beard v. Mobile Press Register, Inc., 908 So. 2d 932 (Ala. Civ. App. 2004).
· cites it 4× “, Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-60(1)g. (providing that if an employee without dependents dies as a result of, and within three years after, an accident under the Act, the employer shall pay $7,500 to that employee's estate).”
Drummond Co., Inc. v. Boatman, 825 So. 2d 823 (Ala. Civ. App. 2001).
· cites it 16× “§ 25-5-60. ". . . "... Because § 25-5-57(a)(5) states that a dependent's recovery, where the worker's death was not a proximate result of the injury, may not exceed the recovery that would have been available had the worker's death been attributable to the injury, I believe the…”
Jimmy Stein Motor Lines, Inc. v. Griffin, 643 So. 2d 1388 (Ala. Civ. App. 1994).
· cites it 6× “Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-60, governs the computation of death benefits and the persons entitled to recovery.”
Ex Parte State Dept. of Indus. Relations, 848 So. 2d 251 (Ala. 2002).
· cites it 11× “The recovery of benefits by dependents following the death of an employee caused by a work-related injury is governed by § 25-5-60, Ala.Code 1975; that section provides, in pertinent part: "In death cases, where the death results proximately from the accident within three years,…”
Mattison v. Kirk, 497 So. 2d 120 (Ala. 1986).
“Code 1975, § 25-5-60. Co-employees filed a motion for summary judgment on September 10, 1985, on all claims in the action.”
Ala. Code § 25-5-60(1): 3 cases
Beard v. Mobile Press Register, Inc., 908 So. 2d 932 (Ala. Civ. App. 2004).
“, Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-60(1)g. (providing that if an employee without dependents dies as a result of, and within three years after, an accident under the Act, the employer shall pay $7,500 to that employee's estate).”
Ala. Code § 25-5-60(1)(G): 1 case
Taliaferro v. Goff Grp., 947 So. 2d 1073 (Ala. Civ. App. 2006).
“The present case involves death benefits payable to dependents under the Workers' Compensation Act.”
Ala. Code § 25-5-60(1)(a): 1 case
Drummond Co., Inc. v. Lolley, 786 So. 2d 509 (Ala. Civ. App. 2000).
“See Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-60. In its answer to the widow's petition, the company pleaded the "statute of limitations" as a defense to her claim.”
Ala. Code § 25-5-60(2): 4 cases
Drummond Co., Inc. v. Boatman, 825 So. 2d 823 (Ala. Civ. App. 2001).
“§ 25-5-60. ". . . "... Because § 25-5-57(a)(5) states that a dependent's recovery, where the worker's death was not a proximate result of the injury, may not exceed the recovery that would have been available had the worker's death been attributable to the injury, I believe the…”
Ala. Code § 25-5-60(l): 4 cases
Blansit v. Cornelius & Rush Coal Co., 380 So. 2d 854 (Ala. Civ. App. 1979).
“In fact, I can find no material change in what is now codified as § 25-5-60 through § 25-5-68 since 1923. There has been a rearranging of the sections from the Code of 1940 and the Code recompiled in 1958 into the Code of 1975.”
Ala. Code § 25-5-60(l)(a): 2 cases
Blansit v. Cornelius & Rush Coal Co., 380 So. 2d 854 (Ala. Civ. App. 1979).
“In fact, I can find no material change in what is now codified as § 25-5-60 through § 25-5-68 since 1923. There has been a rearranging of the sections from the Code of 1940 and the Code recompiled in 1958 into the Code of 1975.”
Ala. Code § 25-5-60(l)(b): 4 cases
Blansit v. Cornelius & Rush Coal Co., 380 So. 2d 854 (Ala. Civ. App. 1979).
“In fact, I can find no material change in what is now codified as § 25-5-60 through § 25-5-68 since 1923. There has been a rearranging of the sections from the Code of 1940 and the Code recompiled in 1958 into the Code of 1975.”
Ala. Code § 25-5-60(l)(c): 1 case
Blansit v. Cornelius & Rush Coal Co., 380 So. 2d 854 (Ala. Civ. App. 1979).
“In fact, I can find no material change in what is now codified as § 25-5-60 through § 25-5-68 since 1923. There has been a rearranging of the sections from the Code of 1940 and the Code recompiled in 1958 into the Code of 1975.”
Ala. Code § 25-5-60(l)(d): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.