Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 26-2A-105 (2026)

Findings; Order of Appointment.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The court shall exercise the authority conferred in this division so as to encourage the development of maximum self-reliance and independence of the incapacitated person and make appointive and other orders only to the extent necessitated by the incapacitated person’s mental and adaptive limitations or other conditions warranting the procedure.

(b) The court may appoint a guardian as requested if it is satisfied that the person for whom a guardian is sought is incapacitated and that the appointment is necessary or desirable as a means of providing continuing care and supervision of the person of the incapacitated person. The court, on appropriate findings, may (i) treat the petition as one for a protective order under Section 26-2A-130 and proceed accordingly, (ii) enter any other appropriate order, or (iii) dismiss the proceedings.

(c) The court, at the time of appointment or later, on its own motion or on appropriate petition or motion of the incapacitated person or other interested person, may limit the powers of a guardian otherwise conferred by this chapter and thereby create a limited guardianship. Any limitation on the statutory power of a guardian of an incapacitated person must be endorsed on the guardian’s letters or, in the case of a guardian by parental or spousal appointment, must be reflected in letters issued at the time any limitation is imposed. Following the same procedure, a limitation may be removed or modified and appropriate letters issued.

(Acts 1987, No. 87-590, p. 975, §2-206.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2023 · leading case: Allen v. Scott (In re Scott), 481 B.R. 119 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2012).
Allen v. Scott (In re Scott), 481 B.R. 119 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2012). · cites it 7× “at § 26-2A-105 (emphasis added). Similarly, section 26-2A-148 allows an order which specifies, “only a part of the property of the protected person vests in the conservator [which] creates a limited conservator-ship.”
Casey v. Casey, 88 So. 3d 822 (Ala. 2012). · cites it 2× “See Ala.Code 1975, § 26-2A-105(b) (“The court may appoint a guardian as requested if it is satisfied that the person for whom a guardian is sought is incapacitated and that the appointment is necessary or desirable as a means of providing continuing care and supervision of the…”
Tamera Erskine, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of Joann Bashinsky v. J. Kenneth Guin, Jr., & Gregory H. Hawley (Ala. 2023). · cites it 2× “See Ala. Code 1975, § 26-2A-105(b) ('The court may appoint a guardian as requested if it is satisfied that the person for whom a guardian is sought is incapacitated and that the appointment is necessary or desirable as a means of providing continuing care and supervision of the…”
Ala. Code § 26-2A-105(b): 2 cases
Casey v. Casey, 88 So. 3d 822 (Ala. 2012). “See Ala.Code 1975, § 26-2A-105(b) (“The court may appoint a guardian as requested if it is satisfied that the person for whom a guardian is sought is incapacitated and that the appointment is necessary or desirable as a means of providing continuing care and supervision of the…”
Tamera Erskine, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of Joann Bashinsky v. J. Kenneth Guin, Jr., & Gregory H. Hawley (Ala. 2023). “See Ala. Code 1975, § 26-2A-105(b) ('The court may appoint a guardian as requested if it is satisfied that the person for whom a guardian is sought is incapacitated and that the appointment is necessary or desirable as a means of providing continuing care and supervision of the…”
Ala. Code § 26-2A-105(c): 1 case
Allen v. Scott (In re Scott), 481 B.R. 119 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2012). “at § 26-2A-105 (emphasis added). Similarly, section 26-2A-148 allows an order which specifies, “only a part of the property of the protected person vests in the conservator [which] creates a limited conservator-ship.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.