(a) The commissioner may hold hearings for any purpose within the scope of this title deemed by him to be necessary.
(b) The commissioner shall hold a hearing if required by any provision, or upon written demand therefor by a person aggrieved by any act, threatened act or failure of the commissioner to act or by any report, rule, regulation, or order of the commissioner, other than an order for the holding of a hearing or an order on hearing or pursuant thereto. Any such demand shall specify the grounds to be relied upon as a basis for the relief to be demanded at the hearing, and unless postponed by mutual consent, the hearing shall be held within 30 days after receipt by the commissioner of demand therefor.
(c) Pending such hearing and decision thereon, the commissioner may suspend or postpone the effective date of his previous action.
(d) This section does not apply as to hearings provided for in Chapter 13 of this title.
(Acts 1971, No. 407, p. 707, §43.)
Notes of Decisions
Allen v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 59 F. Supp. 2d 1217 (S.D. Ala. 1999).
· cites it 6× “Ala.Code § 27-2-28; 3 see also Procedural Rules Governing Administrative Hearings, *1226 Regulation No.”
Alabama Mut. Ins. Corp. v. City of Vernon, 178 So. 3d 350 (Ala. 2013).
· cites it 3× “The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies also does not bar Vernon’s, now the City of Fairfield’s, claims because the remedies in §§ 27-2-28 and 27-13-71, Ala.Code 1975, are permissive and not mandatory.”
Peacock v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 51 So. 3d 298 (Ala. 2010).
“See § 27-2-28(b), Ala.Code 1975. Once the commissioner has issued a decision, or if the commissioner refuses to hold a hearing, the aggrieved party may appeal to the Montgomery Circuit Court.”
Attorneys Ins. Mut. v. Dept. of Ins., 64 So. 3d 1 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010).
· cites it 3× “See § 27-2-28, Ala.Code 1975. The commissioner conducted a hearing at which he received ore tenus evidence and a number of documentary exhibits.”
— Ala. Code § 27-2-28(b) — 4 cases
Peacock v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 51 So. 3d 298 (Ala. 2010).
“See § 27-2-28(b), Ala.Code 1975. Once the commissioner has issued a decision, or if the commissioner refuses to hold a hearing, the aggrieved party may appeal to the Montgomery Circuit Court.”
Alabama Mut. Ins. Corp. v. City of Vernon, 178 So. 3d 350 (Ala. 2013).
“The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies also does not bar Vernon’s, now the City of Fairfield’s, claims because the remedies in §§ 27-2-28 and 27-13-71, Ala.Code 1975, are permissive and not mandatory.”
Attorneys Ins. Mut. v. Dept. of Ins., 64 So. 3d 1 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010).
“See § 27-2-28, Ala.Code 1975. The commissioner conducted a hearing at which he received ore tenus evidence and a number of documentary exhibits.”
— Ala. Code § 27-2-28(d) — 1 case
Allen v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 59 F. Supp. 2d 1217 (S.D. Ala. 1999).
“Ala.Code § 27-2-28; 3 see also Procedural Rules Governing Administrative Hearings, *1226 Regulation No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.