(a) A person required to deliver the required documents or report pursuant to Section 35-8A-402(c) or 35-8A-407 shall provide a purchaser of a unit with a copy of the offering statement and all amendments thereto not later than the date of any contract of sale. Unless a purchaser is given the required documents more than seven days before execution of a contract for the purchase of a unit, the purchaser may cancel the contract within seven days after first receiving the required documents or report.
(b) If a purchaser elects to cancel a contract or conveyance pursuant to subsection (a), he or she may do so by hand-delivering notice thereof to the offeror or by mailing notice thereof by prepaid United States mail to the offeror or to his or her agent for service of process. Cancellation is without penalty, and all payments made by the purchaser before cancellation shall be refunded promptly.
(c) If a person required to deliver an offering statement or report pursuant to Section 35-8A-402(c) or 35-8A-407 fails to provide a purchaser to whom a unit is conveyed with the documents required by subsection (a), the purchaser, at the purchaser’s option and in lieu of any rights to damages or other relief, is entitled to receive from that person an amount equal to five percent of the sales price of the unit if the purchaser provides notice of the election to that person in the same manner as described in subsection (b) within six months of the date of conveyance of the unit.
(Acts 1990, No. 90-551, p. 858, §4-108; Act 2018-403, §1.)
Notes of Decisions
Smith v. Slack Alost Dev. Servs. of Alabama, LLC, 32 So. 3d 556 (Ala. 2009).
· cites it 14× “He further alleges that, pursuant to § 35-8A-408, he rescinded his contract to purchase unit 302 by a letter from his attorney to Slack Alost dated April 30, 2007.”
Grant v. Breland Homes, LLC, 156 So. 3d 391 (Ala. 2014).
“Weems and Smith have both argued that Slack Alost never presented them with the original offering statement or the amended offering statement for the Bel Sole condominium development, in violation of § 35-8A-408.”
Patterson v. Jai Maatadee, Inc., 131 So. 3d 607 (Ala. 2013).
“Weems and Smith are business partners accused of breaching the same real-estate contract, and, as Hazel did, Weems and Smith have both argued that Slack Alost never presented them with the original offering statement or the amended offering statement for the Bel Sole condominium…”
Sparks v. Allstate Indem. Co., 62 So. 3d 536 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010).
“Weems and Smith are business partners accused of breaching the same real-estate contract, and, as Hazel did, Weems and Smith have both argued that Slack Alost never presented them with the original offering statement or the amended offering statement for the Bel Sole condominium…”
Andrew J. Gentry III v. Daniel L. Lindsey, Sr., 160 So. 3d 271 (Ala. 2014).
“Weems and Smith have both argued that Slack Alost never presented them with the original offering statement or the amended offering statement for the Bel Sole condominium development, in violation of § 35-8A-408.”
Ala. Code § 35-8A-408(a): 1 case
Smith v. Slack Alost Dev. Servs. of Alabama, LLC, 32 So. 3d 556 (Ala. 2009).
“He further alleges that, pursuant to § 35-8A-408, he rescinded his contract to purchase unit 302 by a letter from his attorney to Slack Alost dated April 30, 2007.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.