(a) Except under open-end credit plans, the maximum finance charge for any credit transaction where the original amount financed is less than two thousand dollars ($2,000), may equal but may not exceed the total of the following:
(1) Fifteen dollars ($15) per one hundred dollars ($100) per year for the first seven hundred fifty dollars ($750) of the original amount financed; and
(2) Ten dollars ($10) per one hundred dollars ($100) per year for that portion of the original amount financed exceeding seven hundred fifty dollars ($750) and less than two thousand dollars ($2,000).
The maximum finance charge under this subsection shall be determined by computing the maximum rates authorized by this subsection on the original amount financed for the full term of the contract without regard to scheduled payments and the maximum finance charge so determined, or any lesser amount, may be added to the original amount financed. The finance charge may be calculated and expressed as a simple interest charge or by any method which does not result in a finance charge yield greater than the yield permitted by this subsection.
(b) A creditor, in connection with any credit sale other than a sale made under an open-end credit plan, may contract for and receive a minimum finance charge not in excess of the following amounts:
(1) Four dollars ($4) on any credit sale in which the amount financed is twenty-five dollars ($25) or less; and
(2) Six dollars ($6) on any credit sale in which the amount financed is more than twenty-five dollars ($25).
(c) In an open-end credit plan, if there is an unpaid balance on the date as of which the finance charge is applied, a creditor may contract for and receive a minimum finance charge in an amount not exceeding fifty cents ($.50) per month.
(d) Other than under an open-end credit plan, in any credit transaction where the finance charge is computed on the unpaid balance of the amount financed outstanding from time to time, for the actual time outstanding:
(1) Each payment shall be applied first to accrued charges and the remainder of the payment applied to the unpaid balance of the amount financed, except that if the amount of the payment is insufficient to pay the accumulated charges, unpaid charges continue to accumulate to be paid from the proceeds of subsequent payments and are not added to the unpaid amount financed.
(2) Except for permissible prepaid finance charges, the finance charge shall not be payable in advance, or compounded; however, if part or all of the consideration for a new credit transaction contract is the unpaid amount financed and unpaid accrued charges of a prior credit transaction, then the amount financed under the new credit transaction contract may include any unpaid accrued charges. The resulting credit transaction contract shall be deemed a new and separate credit transaction for all purposes.
(3) Debtors may pay in advance the unpaid balance of the amount financed and all accrued finance charges without penalty.
(4) For purposes of computing finance charges for a fraction of a month, a day may be considered one-thirtieth of a month, at the option of the creditor.
(e) The provisions of this section shall not apply to any credit transaction with an original amount financed that is equal to or greater than two thousand dollars ($2,000). The finance charge for any credit transaction with an original amount financed or original principal balance not less than two thousand dollars ($2,000) and for any open-end credit plan with a credit limit not less than two thousand dollars ($2,000) shall be subject to the provisions of Section 8-8-5, or Sections 5-20-2, et seq., as applicable. The maximum finance charge for any open-end credit plan with a credit limit of less than two thousand dollars ($2,000) shall be determined by Section 8-8-14, or Sections 5-20-2, et seq., as applicable.
(Acts 1971, No. 2052, p. 3290, §2; Acts 1979, No. 79-328, p. 499, §1; Acts 1996, No. 96-576, p. 887, §2.)
Notes of Decisions
Centennial Assocs., Ltd. v. Clark, 384 So. 2d 616 (Ala. 1980).
· cites it 14× “It is important to understand that although § 5-19-3 establishes "maximum finance charges," that section has reference to the maximum yield or return which a creditor may charge for the use of his money.”
Fuller v. Assocs. Com. Corp., 389 So. 2d 506 (Ala. 1980).
· cites it 11× “The security agreement which is the subject of Associates' claim and Fuller's counterclaim provided that Associates would receive a yield on the money loaned to Fuller to finance his tractor-trailer rig computed at a rate in excess of the 8% simple interest allowed by Code 1975,…”
Mccullar v. Univ. Underwriters Life Ins., 687 So. 2d 156 (Ala. 1996).
· cites it 7× “) The legislature knew how to make itself clear when it was referring to principal only, when it used the terms "original amount financed" and "original principal.”
Ex Parte Watley, 708 So. 2d 890 (Ala. 1997).
· cites it 5× “Thus, the interest rate limitation imposed by § 5-19-3 on loans above $2,000 was superseded by § 8-8-5 from 1980 until 1996, when § 5-19-3 was amended by Act No.”
Willis v. Quality Mortg. USA, Inc., 5 F. Supp. 2d 1306 (M.D. Ala. 1998).
· cites it 3× “…*1311 Alabama Code, § 340 of the 1958 Code became § 5-19-31 of the 1975 Code; § 316 became § 5-19-1; and § 317 became § 5-19-3. The substance of those sections did not change when they were renumbered. Thus, when the Fletcher court held that §§ 316(a) and 317 applied to real…”
Edwards v. Alabama Farm Bureau Mut. Cas. Ins., 509 So. 2d 232 (Ala. Civ. App. 1986).
· cites it 2× “During the course of the trial Farm Bureau admitted that it had assessed Edwards a finance charge in excess of that permitted under section 5-19-3, Code 1975. Over timely objection of counsel for Edwards, Farm Bureau was then allowed to introduce evidence intended to show that…”
Ex Parte Edwards, 601 So. 2d 82 (Ala. 1992).
“On remand, Farm Bureau admitted that the finance charge was excessive under § 5-19-3, Ala.Code 1975. However, Farm Bureau was allowed to present evidence that the excessiveness was due to a bona fide clerical error and that Farm Bureau was exempt from liability under § 5-19-19,…”
Falkner v. Bank of the Se., 383 So. 2d 177 (Ala. Civ. App. 1979).
· cites it 11× “The dispositive issue is whether § 5-19-3, Code of Ala.1975 (Mini-Code), interest rates apply to what defendant terms “noncon-sumer” loans.”
Warehouse Home Furnishing Distributors, Inc. v. Whitson, 709 So. 2d 1144 (Ala. 1997).
“If the nonfiling premiums are taken out of the "amount financed" and, instead, are included as a "finance charge," as they should have been, then the financing charge exceeds what is allowed under the Mini-Code, § 5-19-3. The plaintiffs contend that Farmers Furniture acted…”
United Companies Lending v. McGehee, 686 So. 2d 1171 (Ala. 1996).
“) Section 5-19-31(a) provides: " The provisions of this chapter, except the provisions of subdivision (1) of Section 5-19-1 and Section 5-19-3, shall not apply to any loan, forbearance, credit sale, lease, or other transaction involving an interest in real property or the sale,…”
— Ala. Code § 5-19-3(a) — 7 cases
Centennial Assocs., Ltd. v. Clark, 384 So. 2d 616 (Ala. 1980).
“It is important to understand that although § 5-19-3 establishes "maximum finance charges," that section has reference to the maximum yield or return which a creditor may charge for the use of his money.”
Fuller v. Assocs. Com. Corp., 389 So. 2d 506 (Ala. 1980).
“The security agreement which is the subject of Associates' claim and Fuller's counterclaim provided that Associates would receive a yield on the money loaned to Fuller to finance his tractor-trailer rig computed at a rate in excess of the 8% simple interest allowed by Code 1975,…”
Ex Parte Watley, 708 So. 2d 890 (Ala. 1997).
“Thus, the interest rate limitation imposed by § 5-19-3 on loans above $2,000 was superseded by § 8-8-5 from 1980 until 1996, when § 5-19-3 was amended by Act No.”
Edwards v. Alabama Farm Bureau Mut. Cas. Ins., 509 So. 2d 232 (Ala. Civ. App. 1986).
“During the course of the trial Farm Bureau admitted that it had assessed Edwards a finance charge in excess of that permitted under section 5-19-3, Code 1975. Over timely objection of counsel for Edwards, Farm Bureau was then allowed to introduce evidence intended to show that…”
— Ala. Code § 5-19-3(b) — 3 cases
Mccullar v. Univ. Underwriters Life Ins., 687 So. 2d 156 (Ala. 1996).
“) The legislature knew how to make itself clear when it was referring to principal only, when it used the terms "original amount financed" and "original principal.”
— Ala. Code § 5-19-3(e) — 2 cases
Ex Parte Watley, 708 So. 2d 890 (Ala. 1997).
“Thus, the interest rate limitation imposed by § 5-19-3 on loans above $2,000 was superseded by § 8-8-5 from 1980 until 1996, when § 5-19-3 was amended by Act No.”
— Ala. Code § 5-19-3(f) — 1 case
Mccullar v. Univ. Underwriters Life Ins., 687 So. 2d 156 (Ala. 1996).
“) The legislature knew how to make itself clear when it was referring to principal only, when it used the terms "original amount financed" and "original principal.”
— Ala. Code § 5-19-3(f)(1) — 1 case
Mccullar v. Univ. Underwriters Life Ins., 687 So. 2d 156 (Ala. 1996).
“) The legislature knew how to make itself clear when it was referring to principal only, when it used the terms "original amount financed" and "original principal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.