Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 10.06.218 (2026)
Effect of issuance of certificate of incorporation
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 10.06.218. Effect of issuance of certificate of incorporation.
The corporate existence begins on the issuance of the certificate of incorporation. That certificate is conclusive evidence that all precedent conditions required to be performed by the incorporators have been satisfied and that the corporation has been incorporated. Issuance does not affect the right of the state to bring a proceeding to cancel or revoke the certificate or for involuntary dissolution of the corporation. The doctrines of de jure compliance, de facto corporations, and corporations by estoppel are abolished.
The corporate existence begins on the issuance of the certificate of incorporation. That certificate is conclusive evidence that all precedent conditions required to be performed by the incorporators have been satisfied and that the corporation has been incorporated. Issuance does not affect the right of the state to bring a proceeding to cancel or revoke the certificate or for involuntary dissolution of the corporation. The doctrines of de jure compliance, de facto corporations, and corporations by estoppel are abolished.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2024 · leading case: Cynthia Aiken Janet Carter & Reg'l Alcohol & Drug Abuse Couns. Training Prog. v. Alaska Addiction Professionals Ass'n NAADAC, the Ass'n for Addiction Professionals Diane Ogilvie & Akeela, Inc., Alaska Addiction Professionals Ass'n NAADAC, the Ass'n for Addiction Professionals Diane Ogilvie & Akeela, Inc. v. Cynthia Aiken Janet Carter & Reg'l Alcohol & Drug Abuse Couns. Training Prog., 552 P.3d 454 (Alaska 2024).
Cynthia Aiken Janet Carter & Reg'l Alcohol & Drug Abuse Couns. Training Prog. v. Alaska Addiction Professionals Ass'n NAADAC, the Ass'n for Addiction Professionals Diane Ogilvie & Akeela, Inc., Alaska Addiction Professionals Ass'n NAADAC, the Ass'n for Addiction Professionals Diane Ogilvie & Akeela, Inc. v. Cynthia Aiken Janet Carter & Reg'l Alcohol & Drug Abuse Couns. Training Prog., 552 P.3d 454 (Alaska 2024). “60 Aiken, Carter, and RADACT argue that under AS 10.06.218 de facto corporations are not recognized in Alaska.”
Lake & Peninsula Borough v. Local Boundary Comm'n, 885 P.2d 1059 (Alaska 1994). “The Villages argue that the de facto doctrine should not apply because: (1) the Alaska Legislature abolished the de facto doctrine with respect to private corporations, AS 10.06.218; and (2) even if the doctrine has not been abolished for municipal corporations, there was no…”
Minchumina Natives, Inc. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 394 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (D. Alaska 2005). “…not pertinent here, the provisions of AS 10.06 apply to matters on or after July 1, 1989. 35 . AS 10.06.678(b). 36 . AS 10.06.218.”
City & Borough of Juneau v. State, Local Boundary Comm'n, 361 P.3d 926 (Alaska 2015). “"); see AS 10.06.218 (''The doctrines of de jure compliance, de facto corporations, and corporations by estoppel are abolished.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.