Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 10.50.150 (2026)

Authorization of company affairs

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 10.50.150. Authorization of company affairs.
Article 6. Membership.
 (a) Unless otherwise provided in an operating agreement of the company, the company's articles of organization, or by this chapter, if the company is not managed by a manager, the consent of more than one-half of all of the members of a limited liability company is required to decide the affairs of the company.

 (b) Unless otherwise provided in an operating agreement of the company or by this chapter, the consent of more than one-half of the number of managers of a limited liability company is required to decide the affairs of the company.

 (c) Notwithstanding (a) and (b) of this section, and unless otherwise provided in an operating agreement of the company or in the company's articles of organization, the written consent of all of the members of a limited liability company is required to
     (1) amend the articles of organization;

     (2) amend an operating agreement of the company; or

     (3) authorize a manager or member to perform an act on behalf of the company that contravenes an operating agreement of the company, including an act that contravenes a provision of the operating agreement that expressly limits the purposes, affairs, or conduct of the affairs of the company.

 (d) [Repealed, § 4 ch 52 SLA 2007.]




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Alaska Interstate Constr., LLC v. Pac. Diversified Investments, Inc., 279 P.3d 1156 (Alaska 2012).
Alaska Interstate Constr., LLC v. Pac. Diversified Investments, Inc., 279 P.3d 1156 (Alaska 2012). · cites it 2× “145 Relying on AS 10.50.150(c), the superior court ruled as a matter of law that the operating agreement could not be orally modified.”
— Alaska Stat. § 10.50.150(c) — 1 case
Alaska Interstate Constr., LLC v. Pac. Diversified Investments, Inc., 279 P.3d 1156 (Alaska 2012). “145 Relying on AS 10.50.150(c), the superior court ruled as a matter of law that the operating agreement could not be orally modified.”
— Alaska Stat. § 10.50.150(c)(3) — 1 case
Alaska Interstate Constr., LLC v. Pac. Diversified Investments, Inc., 279 P.3d 1156 (Alaska 2012). “145 Relying on AS 10.50.150(c), the superior court ruled as a matter of law that the operating agreement could not be orally modified.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.