Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 11.16.100 (2026)
Legal accountability based upon conduct
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 11.16.100. Legal accountability based upon conduct.
A person is guilty of an offense if it is committed by the person's own conduct or by the conduct of another for which the person is legally accountable under AS 11.16.110, or by both.
A person is guilty of an offense if it is committed by the person's own conduct or by the conduct of another for which the person is legally accountable under AS 11.16.110, or by both.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1984–2011 · leading case: Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez, 549 U.S. 183 (2007).
Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez, 549 U.S. 183 (2007). “§ 53a-8(a) (2005); Del.Code Ann., Tit. 11, § 271 (1995); D.”
Andrew v. State, 237 P.3d 1027 (Alaska Ct. App. 2010). “This is the general rule for criminal liability codified in AS 11.16.100. This statute declares that a person can be convicted of a crime if the offense was committed "by [their] own conduct[,] or by the conduct of another for which [that] person is legally accountable under…”
Baker v. State, 905 P.2d 479 (Alaska Ct. App. 1995). “In its place, AS 11.16.100 states the general rule of criminal liability without reference to the terms “principal” and “accessory”: A person is guilty of an offense if it is committed by the person’s own conduct[,] or by the conduct of another for which the person is legally…”
Ingram v. State, 703 P.2d 415 (Alaska Ct. App. 1985). “AS 11.16.100 provides: "A person is guilty of an offense if it is committed by the person’s own conduct or by the conduct of another for which the person is legally accountable under AS 11.”
Dailey v. State, 675 P.2d 657 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984). “Former AS 11.16.100 provided: Legal accountability based upon conduct.”
Knutson v. State, 736 P.2d 775 (Alaska Ct. App. 1987). “AS 11.16.100. Legal accountability based upon the conduct of another: Complicity.”
Lawson v. State, 264 P.3d 590 (Alaska Ct. App. 2011). “Penal Code § 971 (West 2011); AS 11.16.100; former AS 12.15.010 (1972); Andrew v.”
Erickson v. State, 824 P.2d 725 (Alaska Ct. App. 1991). “The state actually cited AS 11.16.100(2)(B) in the indictment. However, in context, it is obvious that the state intended to cite AS 11.”
Kinegak v. State, 747 P.2d 541 (Alaska Ct. App. 1987). “4 See AS 11.16.100. 5 The legislature has provided a defense to a charge of illegal sale of alcohol for one who does not profit.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.16.100(2)(B) — 1 case
Erickson v. State, 824 P.2d 725 (Alaska Ct. App. 1991). “The state actually cited AS 11.16.100(2)(B) in the indictment. However, in context, it is obvious that the state intended to cite AS 11.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.