Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 12.30.030 (2026)

Appeal from conditions of release

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 12.30.030. Appeal from conditions of release.
 (a) If a person remains in custody after a review provided for in AS 12.30.006(c) or (d), an appeal may be taken to the court having appellate jurisdiction over the court imposing the conditions. The appellate court shall affirm the order unless it finds that the lower court abused its discretion.

 (b) If the appellate court finds that the lower court abused its discretion, the appellate court may modify the order, remand the matter for further proceedings, or remand the matter directing entry of the appropriate order, including release under AS 12.30.011(a). The appeal shall be determined promptly.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2025 · leading case: Griffith v. State, 641 P.2d 228 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982).
Griffith v. State, 641 P.2d 228 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 6× “See AS 12.30.030(b) which provides in relevant part: When a court denies a motion under (a) of this section [a motion for release from pretrial or post-conviction detention] or conditions of release have been imposed by the court having original jurisdiction over the offense, an…”
Stiegele v. State, 685 P.2d 1255 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 3× “AS 12.30.030(b); 1 Alaska R.App.P. 206(b) 2 ; Alaska R.”
Gilbert v. State, 540 P.2d 485 (Alaska 1975). · cites it 3× “See AS 12.30.030(b) ; Buies 23 and 24, Buies of Appellate Procedure.”
Carman v. State, 564 P.2d 361 (Alaska 1977). “The case can also be viewed as having been brought before this court as an appeal pursuant to the authorization found in AS 12.30.030. 3 . The state also relies on subsections (a) and (d)(6) of Rule 16, Rules of Criminal Procedure.”
A.M. v. State, 653 P.2d 346 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). “This court regularly hears adult bail appeals which are authorized under AS 12.30.030(b) and Appellate Rule 207. 2 Rule 207 provides that bail appeals “shall be determined promptly” and provides a simplified appellate procedure where the appeal is filed in the form of a motion…”
AM v. State, 653 P.2d 346 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 3× “AS 12.30.030(b); Appellate Rule 207. It seems clear that under AS 47.”
Hawes v. Angol (D. Alaska 2025). “3 Petitioner has not shown that exhaustion of his excessive bail claim would be futile, that 4 an appeal would be inadequate or not efficacious, or that irreparable injury would result from 5 declining to waive the exhaustion requirement.”
— Alaska Stat. § 12.30.030(a) — 1 case
Hawes v. Angol (D. Alaska 2025). “3 Petitioner has not shown that exhaustion of his excessive bail claim would be futile, that 4 an appeal would be inadequate or not efficacious, or that irreparable injury would result from 5 declining to waive the exhaustion requirement.”
— Alaska Stat. § 12.30.030(b) — 5 cases
Griffith v. State, 641 P.2d 228 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). “See AS 12.30.030(b) which provides in relevant part: When a court denies a motion under (a) of this section [a motion for release from pretrial or post-conviction detention] or conditions of release have been imposed by the court having original jurisdiction over the offense, an…”
Stiegele v. State, 685 P.2d 1255 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984). “AS 12.30.030(b); 1 Alaska R.App.P. 206(b) 2 ; Alaska R.”
Gilbert v. State, 540 P.2d 485 (Alaska 1975). “See AS 12.30.030(b) ; Buies 23 and 24, Buies of Appellate Procedure.”
A.M. v. State, 653 P.2d 346 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). “This court regularly hears adult bail appeals which are authorized under AS 12.30.030(b) and Appellate Rule 207. 2 Rule 207 provides that bail appeals “shall be determined promptly” and provides a simplified appellate procedure where the appeal is filed in the form of a motion…”
AM v. State, 653 P.2d 346 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). “AS 12.30.030(b); Appellate Rule 207. It seems clear that under AS 47.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.