Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 13.26.165 (2026)

[Renumbered as

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 13.26.165. [Renumbered as AS 13.26.401.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1999–2017 · leading case: Farmer v. Farmer, 230 P.3d 689 (Alaska 2010).
Farmer v. Farmer, 230 P.3d 689 (Alaska 2010). · cites it 15× “In a previous decision regarding AS 13.26.165 we declined to read additional requirements into the statute: "We must look to the statute to determine its requirements.”
In re of S.H., 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). · cites it 9× “The final appointment question is whether there was sufficient factual basis under AS 13.26.165 to find S.H. unable to manage his property effectively.”
Wilson v. State, Dep't of Law, 355 P.3d 549 (Alaska 2015). · cites it 2× “See AS 13.26.165(2). 5 . AS 13.26.106(c) provides that upon the filing of a guardianship petition the court shall "appoint an expert .”
Samaniego v. City of Kodiak, 80 P.3d 216 (Alaska 2003). “testimony in affirming superior court’s determination of conservatee’s inability to manage his property and affairs effectively under AS 13.26.165); Nelson v. State, 874 P.2d 298, 303 (Alaska App.”
Hopper v. Est. of Goard, 386 P.3d 1245 (Alaska 2017). “AS 13.26.165(2). 12 . Cf. McCormick v. Smith, 793 P.”
H.C.S. v. Cmty. Advocacy Proj. of Alaska, Inc., 42 P.3d 1093 (Alaska 2002). “After death, resignation, or removal, the court may appoint another conservator.”
In the Matter of the Prot. Proceedings of Vernon H., 332 P.3d 565 (Alaska 2014). “AS 13.26.165(2) provides that a conservator may be appointed "if the court determines that (A) the person is unable to manage the person's property and affairs effectively .”
In Re Sh, 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). · cites it 9× “The final appointment question is whether there was sufficient factual basis under AS 13.26.165 to find S.H. unable to manage his property effectively.”
Farmer v. Farmer, 226 P.3d 1030 (Alaska 2010). · cites it 14× “In a previous decision regarding AS 13.26.165 we declined to read additional requirements into the statute: "We must look to the statute to determine its requirements.”
Hcs v. Capa, 42 P.3d 1093 (Alaska 2002). “235 provides: "The court may remove a conservator for good cause, upon notice and hearing, or accept the resignation of a conservator.”
— Alaska Stat. § 13.26.165(2) — 7 cases
Farmer v. Farmer, 230 P.3d 689 (Alaska 2010). “In a previous decision regarding AS 13.26.165 we declined to read additional requirements into the statute: "We must look to the statute to determine its requirements.”
Hopper v. Est. of Goard, 386 P.3d 1245 (Alaska 2017). “AS 13.26.165(2). 12 . Cf. McCormick v. Smith, 793 P.”
Wilson v. State, Dep't of Law, 355 P.3d 549 (Alaska 2015). “See AS 13.26.165(2). 5 . AS 13.26.106(c) provides that upon the filing of a guardianship petition the court shall "appoint an expert .”
In the Matter of the Prot. Proceedings of Vernon H., 332 P.3d 565 (Alaska 2014). “AS 13.26.165(2) provides that a conservator may be appointed "if the court determines that (A) the person is unable to manage the person's property and affairs effectively .”
In re of S.H., 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). “The final appointment question is whether there was sufficient factual basis under AS 13.26.165 to find S.H. unable to manage his property effectively.”
— Alaska Stat. § 13.26.165(2)(A) — 4 cases
Farmer v. Farmer, 230 P.3d 689 (Alaska 2010). “In a previous decision regarding AS 13.26.165 we declined to read additional requirements into the statute: "We must look to the statute to determine its requirements.”
In re of S.H., 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). “The final appointment question is whether there was sufficient factual basis under AS 13.26.165 to find S.H. unable to manage his property effectively.”
Farmer v. Farmer, 226 P.3d 1030 (Alaska 2010). “In a previous decision regarding AS 13.26.165 we declined to read additional requirements into the statute: "We must look to the statute to determine its requirements.”
In Re Sh, 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). “The final appointment question is whether there was sufficient factual basis under AS 13.26.165 to find S.H. unable to manage his property effectively.”
— Alaska Stat. § 13.26.165(2)(B) — 5 cases
Farmer v. Farmer, 230 P.3d 689 (Alaska 2010). “In a previous decision regarding AS 13.26.165 we declined to read additional requirements into the statute: "We must look to the statute to determine its requirements.”
Wilson v. State, Dep't of Law, 355 P.3d 549 (Alaska 2015). “See AS 13.26.165(2). 5 . AS 13.26.106(c) provides that upon the filing of a guardianship petition the court shall "appoint an expert .”
In re of S.H., 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). “The final appointment question is whether there was sufficient factual basis under AS 13.26.165 to find S.H. unable to manage his property effectively.”
Farmer v. Farmer, 226 P.3d 1030 (Alaska 2010). “In a previous decision regarding AS 13.26.165 we declined to read additional requirements into the statute: "We must look to the statute to determine its requirements.”
In Re Sh, 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). “The final appointment question is whether there was sufficient factual basis under AS 13.26.165 to find S.H. unable to manage his property effectively.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.