Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 18.26.210 (2026)
State requirements
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 18.26.210. State requirements.
A medical facility that has been monetarily supported, in any manner whatsoever, by the authority is subject to any state requirements relating to public buildings, structures, grounds, works, or improvements, any requirement of competitive bidding or other restriction imposed on the procedure for award of contracts, or the lease, sale, or other disposition of property of the authority.
A medical facility that has been monetarily supported, in any manner whatsoever, by the authority is subject to any state requirements relating to public buildings, structures, grounds, works, or improvements, any requirement of competitive bidding or other restriction imposed on the procedure for award of contracts, or the lease, sale, or other disposition of property of the authority.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2002–2002 · leading case: H.C.S. v. Cmty. Advocacy Proj. of Alaska, Inc., 42 P.3d 1093 (Alaska 2002).
H.C.S. v. Cmty. Advocacy Proj. of Alaska, Inc., 42 P.3d 1093 (Alaska 2002). “145 and AS 18.26.210, he argues that the court should have removed CAPA, an "institutional stranger," and appointed himself, absent findings that he would be unfit as a guardian and conservator.”
Alaska Stat. § 18.26.210(a): 1 case
H.C.S. v. Cmty. Advocacy Proj. of Alaska, Inc., 42 P.3d 1093 (Alaska 2002). “145 and AS 18.26.210, he argues that the court should have removed CAPA, an "institutional stranger," and appointed himself, absent findings that he would be unfit as a guardian and conservator.”
Alaska Stat. § 18.26.210(a)(2): 1 case
H.C.S. v. Cmty. Advocacy Proj. of Alaska, Inc., 42 P.3d 1093 (Alaska 2002). “145 and AS 18.26.210, he argues that the court should have removed CAPA, an "institutional stranger," and appointed himself, absent findings that he would be unfit as a guardian and conservator.”
Alaska Stat. § 18.26.210(b): 1 case
H.C.S. v. Cmty. Advocacy Proj. of Alaska, Inc., 42 P.3d 1093 (Alaska 2002). “145 and AS 18.26.210, he argues that the court should have removed CAPA, an "institutional stranger," and appointed himself, absent findings that he would be unfit as a guardian and conservator.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.