Alaska Stat. » Chapter 22.10
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 22.10.030 (2026)

Where actions are to be brought

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 22.10.030. Where actions are to be brought.
Venue for all actions shall be set under rules adopted by the supreme court.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1971–2024 · leading case: Erick v. State, 642 P.2d 821 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Erick v. State, 642 P.2d 821 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 10× “AS 22.10.030 [7] and Criminal Rule 18.1 [8] govern motions to change venue.”
Brooks Range Petroleum Corp. v. Shearer, 425 P.3d 65 (Alaska 2018). · cites it 3× “7 AS 22.10.030. 8 Ketchikan Gen. Hosp. , 757 P.”
Ebell v. Seapac Fisheries, Inc., 692 P.2d 956 (Alaska 1984). · cites it 5× “*957 The statutory section that governs venue in cases not involving real property is AS 22.10.030(b), which provides: “If ... a defendant can be personally served within a judicial district of the state, the action against that defendant shall be commenced in that judicial…”
Wilson v. City of Kotzebue, 627 P.2d 623 (Alaska 1981). · cites it 2× “AS 22.10.030(d) provides: Where actions are to be brought.”
Beran v. State, 705 P.2d 1280 (Alaska Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “AS 22.10.030(d). We decline to decide the venue issue at this juncture.”
McClellan v. Kenai Peninsula Borough, 565 P.2d 175 (Alaska 1977). · cites it 6× “Their argument is predicated on AS 22.10.030(d) which states in pertinent part: Subject to § 40 of this chapter, a trial and any precedent or antecedent hearings in an action shall be conducted in a senate district within the judicial district at a location which would best…”
Ko-Am Enter. v. Davis, 657 P.2d 399 (Alaska 1983). · cites it 2× “On June 17,1981, Davis filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, contending that venue was improper in the Third Judicial District pursuant to AS 22.10.030(b). Davis argued that the action should have been brought in the Second Judicial District.”
Johnson v. Nelson, 275 N.W.2d 427 (Iowa 1979). “Compare, Alaska Stat. § 22.10.030 (b) (1966); Kan.”
Stephens v. Hammersley, 552 P.2d 652 (Alaska 1976). · cites it 3× “1 The Hammersleys contend that the language of AS 22.10.030(a), AS 34.35.005 (a) and AS 34.”
Lakritz v. Superior Court, 880 P.2d 1144 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). “2d 956, 957 (Alaska 1984) (construing Alaska Stat. § 22.10.030 (b), which provides venue in the district “in which the claim arose” to include “where the last event necessary to make the defendant liable for the tort took place”); Pearson v.”
Klinger v. Peterson, 486 P.2d 373 (Alaska 1971). “” AS 22.10.030. Lessors complain that the superior court erred in holding that the security deposit of $4,454, held by lessors, was available to make good the failures of the lessees to pay rent and the other breaches of covenant by lessees.”
Abadou v. Trad, 624 P.2d 287 (Alaska 1981). · cites it 3× “II Abadou next argues that AS 22.10.030, 4 which requires that certain actions concerning real property be commenced in the superior court in the judicial district in which the property is situated, requires that this action be brought in Alaska and renders void any decision…”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— Alaska Stat. § 22.10.030(a) — 1 case
Stephens v. Hammersley, 552 P.2d 652 (Alaska 1976). “1 The Hammersleys contend that the language of AS 22.10.030(a), AS 34.35.005 (a) and AS 34.”
— Alaska Stat. § 22.10.030(b) — 3 cases
Brooks Range Petroleum Corp. v. Shearer, 425 P.3d 65 (Alaska 2018). “7 AS 22.10.030. 8 Ketchikan Gen. Hosp. , 757 P.”
Ebell v. Seapac Fisheries, Inc., 692 P.2d 956 (Alaska 1984). “*957 The statutory section that governs venue in cases not involving real property is AS 22.10.030(b), which provides: “If ... a defendant can be personally served within a judicial district of the state, the action against that defendant shall be commenced in that judicial…”
Ko-Am Enter. v. Davis, 657 P.2d 399 (Alaska 1983). “On June 17,1981, Davis filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, contending that venue was improper in the Third Judicial District pursuant to AS 22.10.030(b). Davis argued that the action should have been brought in the Second Judicial District.”
— Alaska Stat. § 22.10.030(c) — 1 case
Erick v. State, 642 P.2d 821 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). “AS 22.10.030 [7] and Criminal Rule 18.1 [8] govern motions to change venue.”
— Alaska Stat. § 22.10.030(d) — 4 cases
Wilson v. City of Kotzebue, 627 P.2d 623 (Alaska 1981). “AS 22.10.030(d) provides: Where actions are to be brought.”
Beran v. State, 705 P.2d 1280 (Alaska Ct. App. 1985). “AS 22.10.030(d). We decline to decide the venue issue at this juncture.”
McClellan v. Kenai Peninsula Borough, 565 P.2d 175 (Alaska 1977). “Their argument is predicated on AS 22.10.030(d) which states in pertinent part: Subject to § 40 of this chapter, a trial and any precedent or antecedent hearings in an action shall be conducted in a senate district within the judicial district at a location which would best…”
Erick v. State, 642 P.2d 821 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). “AS 22.10.030 [7] and Criminal Rule 18.1 [8] govern motions to change venue.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.