Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 25.25.506 (2026)
Contest by obligor
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 25.25.506. Contest by obligor.
(a) An obligor may contest the validity or enforcement of an income withholding order issued in another state and received directly by an employer in this state by registering the order in a tribunal of this state and filing a contest to that order as provided in AS 25.25.601 — 25.25.616 or otherwise contesting the order in the same manner as if the order were issued by a tribunal of this state. The provisions of AS 25.25.604 apply to the contest.
(b) The obligor shall give notice of the contest to
(1) a support enforcement agency providing services to the obligee;
(2) each employer that has directly received an income withholding order relating to the obligor; and
(3) if
(A) a person is designated to receive payments in the income withholding order, to that person; or
(B) no person is designated to receive payments in the income withholding order, to the obligee.
(a) An obligor may contest the validity or enforcement of an income withholding order issued in another state and received directly by an employer in this state by registering the order in a tribunal of this state and filing a contest to that order as provided in AS 25.25.601 — 25.25.616 or otherwise contesting the order in the same manner as if the order were issued by a tribunal of this state. The provisions of AS 25.25.604 apply to the contest.
(b) The obligor shall give notice of the contest to
(1) a support enforcement agency providing services to the obligee;
(2) each employer that has directly received an income withholding order relating to the obligor; and
(3) if
(A) a person is designated to receive payments in the income withholding order, to that person; or
(B) no person is designated to receive payments in the income withholding order, to the obligee.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2016–2016 · leading case: State v. Cent. Council of Tlingit & Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska, 371 P.3d 255 (Alaska 2016).
State v. Cent. Council of Tlingit & Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska, 371 P.3d 255 (Alaska 2016). “”15 The law amending the statute included the legislature’s view that “UIFSA does not determine the authority of an Indian tribe to enter, modify, or enforce a child 10 AS 25.25.506 (allowing an obligor to contest directly enforced orders); AS 25.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.