Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 25.35.010 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Secs. 25.35.010 — 25.35.050. Injunctive relief in cases involving domestic violence. [Repealed, § 72 ch 64 SLA 1996. For current law, see AS 18.66.100 — 18.66.180.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2024 · leading case: Siggelkow v. State, 731 P.2d 57 (Alaska 1987).
Siggelkow v. State, 731 P.2d 57 (Alaska 1987). · cites it 4× “[6] AS 25.35.010, which provides *61 for injunctive relief in cases involving domestic violence, authorizes orders similar to the one at issue, but limits their duration to 90 days.”
Morris v. Horn, 219 P.3d 198 (Alaska 2009). “Whether domestic violence orders issued under [former] AS 25.35.010 or AS 25.35.020 [renumbered as AS 18.”
Whalen v. Whalen, 425 P.3d 150 (Alaska 2018). · cites it 2× “32 The 1996 Act replaced former AS 25.35.010, which provided for a 90-day protective order that could be extended for another 45 days.”
Strother v. State, 891 P.2d 214 (Alaska Ct. App. 1995). “should be extended for 90 days under AS 25.35.010. The next day (May 12, 1992), Timothy Strother requested a hearing to contest Judge Ashman’s issuance of the 20-day restraining order, and particularly the portion of that order that gave Ms.”
Hammock v. State, 52 P.3d 746 (Alaska Ct. App. 2002). “350, unless the context requires otherwise, "enter or remain unlawfully" means to (1) enter or remain in or upon premises or in a propelled vehicle when the premises or propelled vehicle, at the time of the entry or remaining, is not open to the public and when the defendant is…”
F.T. v. State, 862 P.2d 857 (Alaska 1993). “Whether domestic violence orders issued under AS 25.35.010 or AS 25.35.020 can cause issue preclusion in a subsequent child in need of aid proceeding is a topic of some complexity.”
FT v. State, 862 P.2d 857 (Alaska 1993). “Whether domestic violence orders issued under AS 25.35.010 or AS 25.35.020 can cause issue preclusion in a subsequent child in need of aid proceeding is a topic of some complexity.”
Steven William Eng v. State of Alaska, Dep't of Pub. Saf. (Alaska 2024). “22 The Model Code did not include time limits on protective orders issued upon notice and hearing and “shift[ed] the burden from the victim to the perpetrator [to seek] court approval to terminate an order.”
— Alaska Stat. § 25.35.010(b) — 1 case
Hammock v. State, 52 P.3d 746 (Alaska Ct. App. 2002). “350, unless the context requires otherwise, "enter or remain unlawfully" means to (1) enter or remain in or upon premises or in a propelled vehicle when the premises or propelled vehicle, at the time of the entry or remaining, is not open to the public and when the defendant is…”
— Alaska Stat. § 25.35.010(c) — 2 cases
Whalen v. Whalen, 425 P.3d 150 (Alaska 2018). “32 The 1996 Act replaced former AS 25.35.010, which provided for a 90-day protective order that could be extended for another 45 days.”
Steven William Eng v. State of Alaska, Dep't of Pub. Saf. (Alaska 2024). “22 The Model Code did not include time limits on protective orders issued upon notice and hearing and “shift[ed] the burden from the victim to the perpetrator [to seek] court approval to terminate an order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.