Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 29.35.100 (2026)
Budget and capital program
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 29.35.100. Budget and capital program.
(a) The governing body shall establish the manner for the preparation and submission of the budget and capital program. After a public hearing, the governing body may approve the budget with or without amendments, and shall appropriate the money required for the approved budget.
(b) The governing body may make supplemental and emergency appropriations. Payment may not be authorized or made and an obligation may not be incurred except in accordance with appropriations.
(a) The governing body shall establish the manner for the preparation and submission of the budget and capital program. After a public hearing, the governing body may approve the budget with or without amendments, and shall appropriate the money required for the approved budget.
(b) The governing body may make supplemental and emergency appropriations. Payment may not be authorized or made and an obligation may not be incurred except in accordance with appropriations.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1991–2015 · leading case: City of Fairbanks v. Fairbanks Convention & Visitors Bureau, 818 P.2d 1153 (Alaska 1991).
City of Fairbanks v. Fairbanks Convention & Visitors Bureau, 818 P.2d 1153 (Alaska 1991). “” In our view, in the context of the prohibition on repealing “appropriations,” the term should be used in the same sense as the legislature has used it in the municipal code, AS 29.35.100, that is as an act which accompanies the approval of the annual budget or is supplemental…”
Hughes v. Treadwell, 341 P.3d 1121 (Alaska 2015). “nitiative or referendum may: (1) mandate a non-ap-propriative allocation of property-including a transfer of property from a specific government entity-sufficient to accomplish a particular purpose; 62 (2) repeal a legislative enactment that designates the use of government…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.